Please explain why you consider it immoral. If both parties consent and both enjoy the festivities and no lasting damage occurs, what is the problem? You seem to be the only person who thinks its immoral, so I hope you have some good justification at least.
Not the only person, but maybe one of the few who has virtues and withholds to these. Most ofc and especially men wouldn't think its immoral behavior since they themselves engage in such lowly activities due to being animalistic in nature, having to stoop so low.
The only person I have heard on this site. I have checked some other online opinions, and there are a few who think it is immoral, but the overwhelming majority still think it is fine if it is consensual and somewhat safe. Then you say men are more likely to deem it moral, and I agree completely. But so what? You still haven't gotten to why you personally think kinky sex is immoral. Please share!
The few that think its immoral are the ones who know it is. It is immoral and whether or not the vast majority agrees with you or not doesn't change the notion that it is immoral and lowly. It's to do with having standards and dignity and to not be acting animalistic because humans are meant to evolve animals as we have a brain so know what's right and wrong (Well obviously not many do know the difference). No wonder this world is fckd
Your dodging the question. Everything that we agree on that is immoral, there is a reason for.
Rape - women have rights of sex with their own body
Murder - each person has the right to live
Robbery - people have the right to own things that are rightfully theirs.
Notice how nothing we agree is immoral involves consent. Rape is sex without consent, murder involves no consent and neither does theft, or else it would be called borrowing. So how can sexual acts with clear consent given beforehand be immoral?
Because it's still wrong? If a father and daughter agreed to have sex, the girl is say 14 and father is 35. You would then argue its consensual as both agreed to have sex. It is still immoral though and NOT right. Just because two people agree on something doenst make it RIGHT
Well if she is underage, then it is implied that her consent is not valid. That is wjy in the post I said as long as it was consensual, LEGAL and somewhat safe. Now what makes 2 legal adults having consensual sex worse if they add in bondage or spanking for the increase of pleaseure?
Kink shaming Iin?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Please explain why you consider it immoral. If both parties consent and both enjoy the festivities and no lasting damage occurs, what is the problem? You seem to be the only person who thinks its immoral, so I hope you have some good justification at least.
--
strangethingshappen
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Not the only person, but maybe one of the few who has virtues and withholds to these. Most ofc and especially men wouldn't think its immoral behavior since they themselves engage in such lowly activities due to being animalistic in nature, having to stoop so low.
--
Anonymous Post Author
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
The only person I have heard on this site. I have checked some other online opinions, and there are a few who think it is immoral, but the overwhelming majority still think it is fine if it is consensual and somewhat safe. Then you say men are more likely to deem it moral, and I agree completely. But so what? You still haven't gotten to why you personally think kinky sex is immoral. Please share!
--
strangethingshappen
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
The few that think its immoral are the ones who know it is. It is immoral and whether or not the vast majority agrees with you or not doesn't change the notion that it is immoral and lowly. It's to do with having standards and dignity and to not be acting animalistic because humans are meant to evolve animals as we have a brain so know what's right and wrong (Well obviously not many do know the difference). No wonder this world is fckd
--
Anonymous Post Author
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Your dodging the question. Everything that we agree on that is immoral, there is a reason for.
Rape - women have rights of sex with their own body
Murder - each person has the right to live
Robbery - people have the right to own things that are rightfully theirs.
Notice how nothing we agree is immoral involves consent. Rape is sex without consent, murder involves no consent and neither does theft, or else it would be called borrowing. So how can sexual acts with clear consent given beforehand be immoral?
--
strangethingshappen
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Because it's still wrong? If a father and daughter agreed to have sex, the girl is say 14 and father is 35. You would then argue its consensual as both agreed to have sex. It is still immoral though and NOT right. Just because two people agree on something doenst make it RIGHT
--
Anonymous Post Author
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Well if she is underage, then it is implied that her consent is not valid. That is wjy in the post I said as long as it was consensual, LEGAL and somewhat safe. Now what makes 2 legal adults having consensual sex worse if they add in bondage or spanking for the increase of pleaseure?