How did the man cause it tho? As I told dom everything was in Group X's hands. Everything was up to them all along. They could have just as easily said, "You know, we disagree with him but we're not gonna stoop that low"
I appreciate the rest of your comment but I feel its sadly irrelevant. What does Iraq have to do with this?
And how is he ruthless for trying to get rid of people he fears are evil?
By the same standard, wouldn't you be evil for getting rid of thieves and criminals? How ruthless of you!
and that first part is why he lied. He had no sure way to predict that outcome. It was dependent on others. Claiming that outcome as something set in stone is a lie.
Claiming it's a possibility would be fine, but again, would be dependent on the people. If "group x" was peaceful anti-violence people, there's no real option of this happening no matter how much he tries to agitate them.
Claiming something as true while you can't influence it does not make your claim and more true if by CHANCE it becomes true. Up to the point it does, it's poor speculation and claiming otherwise is lying.
Justice outside the moral good
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
How did the man cause it tho? As I told dom everything was in Group X's hands. Everything was up to them all along. They could have just as easily said, "You know, we disagree with him but we're not gonna stoop that low"
I appreciate the rest of your comment but I feel its sadly irrelevant. What does Iraq have to do with this?
And how is he ruthless for trying to get rid of people he fears are evil?
By the same standard, wouldn't you be evil for getting rid of thieves and criminals? How ruthless of you!
--
TerryVie
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
and that first part is why he lied. He had no sure way to predict that outcome. It was dependent on others. Claiming that outcome as something set in stone is a lie.
Claiming it's a possibility would be fine, but again, would be dependent on the people. If "group x" was peaceful anti-violence people, there's no real option of this happening no matter how much he tries to agitate them.
Claiming something as true while you can't influence it does not make your claim and more true if by CHANCE it becomes true. Up to the point it does, it's poor speculation and claiming otherwise is lying.