IT’S NOT CHEATING IF…

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

↑ View this comment's parent

← View full post
Comments ( 11 ) Sort: best | oldest
  • All the other options are far worse for the child's well-being. That's not the definition of masturbation. Touching is not a requirement for masturbation; masturbation merely requires attempted purposeful sexual stimulation. In a similar manner, masturbation is not a requirement for touching, as touching is not usually sexually stimulating, nor is it usually purposefully intending to sexually stimulate.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Well in that case, why don't you go to a nude beach and let your gonads bounce around in the fresh air, you nasty naughty little man, you. Good to know your vengeful God approves of wild naked parties.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • If public nudity weren't a sin, Adam and Eve would not have acknowledged their nudity after eating the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Okay, so the enslaving chains of anxiety from your vengeful God have enshackled your mind after all. Has it ever occurred to you that none of this shit makes any sense? That Genesis is a folk story handed down in the way that bedtime stories for children are. Ur dumb; too dumb to be here.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • Is there such a thing as 'too dumb to be here'?

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • *Sigh*, Ruthie, my friend, your high intelligence qualifies you to make the call. I'm sorry, but this guy's mindless memorization of convincing fallacies of the last millennium is grating on me.

              Thanks for the brushback. It's nice to hear from you again.

              Comment Hidden ( show )
          • It makes just as much sense as anything else.

            Comment Hidden ( show )