You mean live obediently ever after with her continuing promiscuous sexual engagements, and the careless pregnancies that will result, because God has enslaved him in chains of anxiety. Your angry vengeful God will summon fearful retribution if you, Clunk, if you ever even think about touching your own nads.
All the other options are far worse for the child's well-being. That's not the definition of masturbation. Touching is not a requirement for masturbation; masturbation merely requires attempted purposeful sexual stimulation. In a similar manner, masturbation is not a requirement for touching, as touching is not usually sexually stimulating, nor is it usually purposefully intending to sexually stimulate.
Well in that case, why don't you go to a nude beach and let your gonads bounce around in the fresh air, you nasty naughty little man, you. Good to know your vengeful God approves of wild naked parties.
If public nudity weren't a sin, Adam and Eve would not have acknowledged their nudity after eating the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.
Okay, so the enslaving chains of anxiety from your vengeful God have enshackled your mind after all. Has it ever occurred to you that none of this shit makes any sense? That Genesis is a folk story handed down in the way that bedtime stories for children are. Ur dumb; too dumb to be here.
*Sigh*, Ruthie, my friend, your high intelligence qualifies you to make the call. I'm sorry, but this guy's mindless memorization of convincing fallacies of the last millennium is grating on me.
Thanks for the brushback. It's nice to hear from you again.
IT’S NOT CHEATING IF…
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
You mean live obediently ever after with her continuing promiscuous sexual engagements, and the careless pregnancies that will result, because God has enslaved him in chains of anxiety. Your angry vengeful God will summon fearful retribution if you, Clunk, if you ever even think about touching your own nads.
--
Clunk42
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
All the other options are far worse for the child's well-being. That's not the definition of masturbation. Touching is not a requirement for masturbation; masturbation merely requires attempted purposeful sexual stimulation. In a similar manner, masturbation is not a requirement for touching, as touching is not usually sexually stimulating, nor is it usually purposefully intending to sexually stimulate.
--
Bazinga
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-2
-2
Well in that case, why don't you go to a nude beach and let your gonads bounce around in the fresh air, you nasty naughty little man, you. Good to know your vengeful God approves of wild naked parties.
--
Clunk42
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
If public nudity weren't a sin, Adam and Eve would not have acknowledged their nudity after eating the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.
--
Bazinga
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Okay, so the enslaving chains of anxiety from your vengeful God have enshackled your mind after all. Has it ever occurred to you that none of this shit makes any sense? That Genesis is a folk story handed down in the way that bedtime stories for children are. Ur dumb; too dumb to be here.
--
Grunewald
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
Clunk42
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Is there such a thing as 'too dumb to be here'?
--
Bazinga
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
*Sigh*, Ruthie, my friend, your high intelligence qualifies you to make the call. I'm sorry, but this guy's mindless memorization of convincing fallacies of the last millennium is grating on me.
Thanks for the brushback. It's nice to hear from you again.
It makes just as much sense as anything else.
--
Bazinga
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
About as much sense as 2 + 2 = 3.