I didn't call it an insult, I was asking you. I don't think that it was a fact either. When I said "..obviously, it was a fact" I was implying that from your point of view, its a fact because its what you believe to be true. But after all, the truth hurts. I don't see what you'd find contradicting about the two terms. If i were to say, "You're fat." and you did happen to be over weight, then it would be both a fact and an insult. I would criticize you for answering my question with a question but you didn't answer my question at all.
You don't have to stay. Its always been your choice to continue responding to me because, like me, you enjoy arguing. Unfortunately, you're not very good at it. You change the subject too much instead of defending your opinion on the current one. I honestly think that you did read that whole paragraph but didn't know how to respond to it, hence, you changed the subject. I'm only playing around so feel free to cary this on as long as you want.
The topic is that you don't have one to argue on. My poi t is that you can't stick to the same topic. Instead of defending yourself, you attack me. -_-
I shortened this one for you. You're welcome.
(The writing space is getting so friggin small. :D)
Is this dream normal?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Well obviously, it was a fact. What exactly was your purpose for stating it??
--
Erik963
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
If it was a fact why did you call it an insult in the first place ?
--
Anonymous Post Author
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I didn't call it an insult, I was asking you. I don't think that it was a fact either. When I said "..obviously, it was a fact" I was implying that from your point of view, its a fact because its what you believe to be true. But after all, the truth hurts. I don't see what you'd find contradicting about the two terms. If i were to say, "You're fat." and you did happen to be over weight, then it would be both a fact and an insult. I would criticize you for answering my question with a question but you didn't answer my question at all.
--
Erik963
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
and I am implying it is a fact. Now are you going to post another paragraph I wont read anyway or am I free to go ?
--
Anonymous Post Author
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You don't have to stay. Its always been your choice to continue responding to me because, like me, you enjoy arguing. Unfortunately, you're not very good at it. You change the subject too much instead of defending your opinion on the current one. I honestly think that you did read that whole paragraph but didn't know how to respond to it, hence, you changed the subject. I'm only playing around so feel free to cary this on as long as you want.
--
Erik963
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yes because your bullshit is un-ignorable.
There goes another paragraph. Write a bible for me please.
Oh and if you want to argue, you must have a point and topic in the first place, which you obviously don't.
--
Anonymous Post Author
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
The topic is that you don't have one to argue on. My poi t is that you can't stick to the same topic. Instead of defending yourself, you attack me. -_-
I shortened this one for you. You're welcome.
(The writing space is getting so friggin small. :D)