All anyone's really doing here is simply regurgitating back the old mantras they heard from their college professors. And I call them mantras because that's precisely what they are. "There's only one race and that's the human race!" is not an argument. It's not a scientific fact. It's a string of words that in and of itself means nothing; it's a feel-good slogan and nothing more.
But is it really so hard to stop and consider just what it is that you're saying? Any honest person would be able to see that such arguments hold no water whatsoever.
"We all bleed red" is not valid because all mammals bleed red. But no one says that humans and raccoons are the same.
"We're all just human" is not valid because it assumes an arbitrary classification that, while technically true, is irrelevant. It's really a lot like saying "You shouldn't care whether you use salt or cinnamon in your cooking, because they're both just spices."
"Race can't exist because the different races are inter-fertile" is, again, just like saying that different breeds of dog are the same, due to the fact that they are inter-fertile. But, alas, no one says that. No one.
"We're over 99% genetically identical" is another half-truth that is addressed in the video I posted.
Furthermore, wouldn't you agree that it is very, VERY unlikely that after being separated by thousands of years of evolution and thus taking on distinct appearances as well as irrefutable physical distinctions (such as maturation rates and susceptibility to disease) the respective intelligence of each race remained unchanged?
One more question: If it's so backward to advocate for the preservation of the White races of the world, is it also wrong to wish to save the pandas? After all, even they go extinct we've still got plenty of grizzly bears, and just what's the difference anyway? After all, bears are bears, right?
Is there a superior race?
← View full post
All anyone's really doing here is simply regurgitating back the old mantras they heard from their college professors. And I call them mantras because that's precisely what they are. "There's only one race and that's the human race!" is not an argument. It's not a scientific fact. It's a string of words that in and of itself means nothing; it's a feel-good slogan and nothing more.
But is it really so hard to stop and consider just what it is that you're saying? Any honest person would be able to see that such arguments hold no water whatsoever.
"We all bleed red" is not valid because all mammals bleed red. But no one says that humans and raccoons are the same.
"We're all just human" is not valid because it assumes an arbitrary classification that, while technically true, is irrelevant. It's really a lot like saying "You shouldn't care whether you use salt or cinnamon in your cooking, because they're both just spices."
"Race can't exist because the different races are inter-fertile" is, again, just like saying that different breeds of dog are the same, due to the fact that they are inter-fertile. But, alas, no one says that. No one.
"We're over 99% genetically identical" is another half-truth that is addressed in the video I posted.
Furthermore, wouldn't you agree that it is very, VERY unlikely that after being separated by thousands of years of evolution and thus taking on distinct appearances as well as irrefutable physical distinctions (such as maturation rates and susceptibility to disease) the respective intelligence of each race remained unchanged?
One more question: If it's so backward to advocate for the preservation of the White races of the world, is it also wrong to wish to save the pandas? After all, even they go extinct we've still got plenty of grizzly bears, and just what's the difference anyway? After all, bears are bears, right?