You have an interesting outlook. I'm not a physicist, although I have taken a couple of classes. I think that what you have is pretty accurate to how the idea of time started.
Here's something didactic. Time was quantified in the 1400s in order to keep track of business. So yes, the conception of time was a means to regulate events.
As for particles. Well, what does it matter? haha.
In all seriousness, time is a phenomenon that we humans want to grasp. Time is a powerful thing. Laws are built around it, think thermodynamics. Everything decays due to time, however, things evolve due to it as well.
The way you perceive time is rather interesting in its detachment. I'm not at liberty to say how correct you are or how wrong, frankly, you could be right. All I have to say is that I like your opinion.
Is my belief about time normal?
← View full post
You have an interesting outlook. I'm not a physicist, although I have taken a couple of classes. I think that what you have is pretty accurate to how the idea of time started.
Here's something didactic. Time was quantified in the 1400s in order to keep track of business. So yes, the conception of time was a means to regulate events.
As for particles. Well, what does it matter? haha.
In all seriousness, time is a phenomenon that we humans want to grasp. Time is a powerful thing. Laws are built around it, think thermodynamics. Everything decays due to time, however, things evolve due to it as well.
The way you perceive time is rather interesting in its detachment. I'm not at liberty to say how correct you are or how wrong, frankly, you could be right. All I have to say is that I like your opinion.