No, I'm not missing your point, though it does seem that you missed the post wherein I accept and would not be "exempted" from a "human deportation" for any reason. I did state as much, further up the discussion thread.
The IIN rating is 71% in favour of "normal," so maybe this line of thinking isn't so unusual, afterall.
Well, the moon and mars were suggested/discussed by various persons posting, so either could be a destination. Realize, though, that when these two locations were suggested, it would preclude the use of life support technology, and so the assumption is that place at these two locations would, by default, be chosen because any human without protective equipment would die in a matter of seconds/minutes. So, a location was, in fact, selected and discussed (just earlier in the thread).
And yes, the suggestion that teleportation to the moon or Mars would exactly mean termination of the entire species in addition to the human who teleported everyone to the location!
Then again ... you do realize that you can't just magically deport humans to another planet. Not without supplies .. unless you're sending them to their death.
So those supplies would come from the earth. And some of the supplies would likely include recurring trips to get more.
In fact why don't you go do that... since it's what you want... Go research and actually find out just how much we would have to take from the earth in order to follow your idea.
And no - teleportation, terraforming, etc is not allowed. You have to use REAL WORLD science only.
This will include supplies we'd use on other planets.
And the fuel we would need to use to get EVERYONE and the supplies off the planet.
Nuclear power would be acceptable once you're away from the earth & moon. In fact it's actually a *requirement*. Solar power will most likely not generate all you need, and as you move away from the sun it will eventually fail you.
Research this, and then realize - and report - how much you'd have to take away from the earth to accomplish this. and remember since you supposedly don't want to kill off all humans, none will be murdered or convinced to suicide in order to make this easier. no killing off people just to fudge the numbers allowed.
and on top of this, remember... if you got your "pristine earth", you and your decedents would not be allowed to look at it or even visit. after all that would "contaminate" it as many of you seem to think.
which is why ... if you want to take care of where you live fine.
but deporting or killing off all humans is not feasible.
Is it normal to want all humans deported off the planet?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Or join the amish. they aren't really polluting the world as much as the rest of society.
you seem to be missing my point however.
people who want to see the human race destroyed are unusual... mostly because they seem to overlook that it includes their own destruction too.
and that many of these people aren't really willing to give up on the technologies they use anyway.
Perhaps some are imagining having all other people dead save for themselves but ... yeah then there'd be no one to service the technologies they use
--
Miss_Anthrope
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No, I'm not missing your point, though it does seem that you missed the post wherein I accept and would not be "exempted" from a "human deportation" for any reason. I did state as much, further up the discussion thread.
The IIN rating is 71% in favour of "normal," so maybe this line of thinking isn't so unusual, afterall.
--
Angel_in_a_Glass_Dress
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
So... 71% of people here want to kill themselves...
that doesn't mean they're right.
--
Miss_Anthrope
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Not just themselves, Angel. Remember the original question.
--
Angel_in_a_Glass_Dress
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I'm talking about the title.
where would you deport them to? mars? the moon?
without a location you have to realize your ultimate answer would be to kill the species which means... all who support this in fact want humans dead.
including themselves.
--
Miss_Anthrope
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Well, the moon and mars were suggested/discussed by various persons posting, so either could be a destination. Realize, though, that when these two locations were suggested, it would preclude the use of life support technology, and so the assumption is that place at these two locations would, by default, be chosen because any human without protective equipment would die in a matter of seconds/minutes. So, a location was, in fact, selected and discussed (just earlier in the thread).
And yes, the suggestion that teleportation to the moon or Mars would exactly mean termination of the entire species in addition to the human who teleported everyone to the location!
--
Angel_in_a_Glass_Dress
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Then again ... you do realize that you can't just magically deport humans to another planet. Not without supplies .. unless you're sending them to their death.
So those supplies would come from the earth. And some of the supplies would likely include recurring trips to get more.
In fact why don't you go do that... since it's what you want... Go research and actually find out just how much we would have to take from the earth in order to follow your idea.
And no - teleportation, terraforming, etc is not allowed. You have to use REAL WORLD science only.
This will include supplies we'd use on other planets.
And the fuel we would need to use to get EVERYONE and the supplies off the planet.
Nuclear power would be acceptable once you're away from the earth & moon. In fact it's actually a *requirement*. Solar power will most likely not generate all you need, and as you move away from the sun it will eventually fail you.
Research this, and then realize - and report - how much you'd have to take away from the earth to accomplish this. and remember since you supposedly don't want to kill off all humans, none will be murdered or convinced to suicide in order to make this easier. no killing off people just to fudge the numbers allowed.
and on top of this, remember... if you got your "pristine earth", you and your decedents would not be allowed to look at it or even visit. after all that would "contaminate" it as many of you seem to think.
which is why ... if you want to take care of where you live fine.
but deporting or killing off all humans is not feasible.