It's not supposed to be a 100% perfectly divinely inspired holy book. Parts of it are wrong, yes. That doesn't mean the Bible is all made up, which is what we're arguing about. So you finally agree with me that the Bible isn't made up?
I repeat: the Bible is made up. Just because there are some portions that may be accurate, like how Egyptians exist both in real life and in the Bible, that doesn't mean it's not fictional.
"It's not supposed to be a 100% perfectly divinely inspired holy book"
You're saying the Bible wasn't supposed to be divinely inspired? Some Christians may take offense to that.
Nice job ignoring what I say. Doesn't matter what Christians think. The argument is that you can't prove it's made up. Innacuracy in parts of it don't prove it's made up, it proves it's inaccurate in parts.
As for the last part, no, I'm saying it's not perfect in accuracy.
No wonder we're getting nowhere. I ignored that part because it was stupid. 100% innacurate means all the facts stated are wrong. That doesn't prove it's made up just for the heck of it.
I'm actually shocked. You literally don't know what "made up" means.
"I always thought that things that were inaccurate and fictional were made up."
Many fictional parts in it are meant to be in there, to teach a lesson in morality or whatever. I already stated that. There's just no more point in arguing about this.
If you not knowing such a simple definition caused this whole argument, I shouldn't be wasting more of my time.
Fine, I was mistaken about the definition of made up. The bible is still BS, although you're right that I can't prove every statement in it is wrong. You happy?
is it normal to think the bible is bs
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Oh and the first question is that no it's not made up. But your essay isn't supposed to be a 100% perfect divinely inspired holy book.
--
Pumpurrnickel
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
It's not supposed to be a 100% perfectly divinely inspired holy book. Parts of it are wrong, yes. That doesn't mean the Bible is all made up, which is what we're arguing about. So you finally agree with me that the Bible isn't made up?
--
CreamPuffs
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I repeat: the Bible is made up. Just because there are some portions that may be accurate, like how Egyptians exist both in real life and in the Bible, that doesn't mean it's not fictional.
"It's not supposed to be a 100% perfectly divinely inspired holy book"
You're saying the Bible wasn't supposed to be divinely inspired? Some Christians may take offense to that.
--
Pumpurrnickel
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Nice job ignoring what I say. Doesn't matter what Christians think. The argument is that you can't prove it's made up. Innacuracy in parts of it don't prove it's made up, it proves it's inaccurate in parts.
As for the last part, no, I'm saying it's not perfect in accuracy.
--
CreamPuffs
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
"Innacuracy in parts of it don't prove it's made up" so in order to be made up it would have to be 100% innaccurate?
"Nice job ignoring what I say" Speak for yourself.
"The argument is that you can't prove it's made up" I always thought that things that were inaccurate and fictional were made up.
--
Pumpurrnickel
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
...
No wonder we're getting nowhere. I ignored that part because it was stupid. 100% innacurate means all the facts stated are wrong. That doesn't prove it's made up just for the heck of it.
I'm actually shocked. You literally don't know what "made up" means.
"I always thought that things that were inaccurate and fictional were made up."
Many fictional parts in it are meant to be in there, to teach a lesson in morality or whatever. I already stated that. There's just no more point in arguing about this.
If you not knowing such a simple definition caused this whole argument, I shouldn't be wasting more of my time.
--
CreamPuffs
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Fine, I was mistaken about the definition of made up. The bible is still BS, although you're right that I can't prove every statement in it is wrong. You happy?