I never said it wasn't. For all you know, I'm an atheist. You on the other hand straight up said it's made up, as if it's a common fact. Go ahead and use your science to prove it. Or just admit you're in the wrong and learn from it.
Not so, my unlearned friend. What I said was that science is testable. You can make up shit and test it. Random chance says you will be right a certain percentage of the time. For the bible to have credibility, it has to exceed that threshold of random chance. It may be that the bible was not made up. But since it fails to exceed these statistic thresholds, (chi square tests), it really has no credibility other than just ancient stories passed along to successive generations.
The Bible is mostly a book about morality. Morality isn't an illusion it's a concept. If you disagree with that type of morality is another matter. Fact is karma is simply cuase and affect and much of the Bible is thought to be simple fables by Christianity anyways. A better debate is "Do you believe god or heaven is real". You really can't argue that a concept is fake. A concept is simply an idea, if someone had an idea it exists. It's an existing idea.
True, but now you have shifted the discussion away from its initial focus, which is the bible. Christianity, Judiasm, etc are related but separate issues.
Thank you for seeing reason and agreeing with me. I was never arguing what is testable or reliable. I was only looking for proof that the bible is made up, since you said it was. Which makes it ironic calling me "unlearned" when you're agreeing with me.
You said it's made up in your first comment. Then you said it may not be made up in your other most recent comment. That's what I was arguing. You don't know for sure if it's made up or not. You agreed with me. That's all I wanted to hear.
is it normal to think the bible is bs
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Prove its not.
--
Pumpurrnickel
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
I never said it wasn't. For all you know, I'm an atheist. You on the other hand straight up said it's made up, as if it's a common fact. Go ahead and use your science to prove it. Or just admit you're in the wrong and learn from it.
--
McBean
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
rayb12
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Not so, my unlearned friend. What I said was that science is testable. You can make up shit and test it. Random chance says you will be right a certain percentage of the time. For the bible to have credibility, it has to exceed that threshold of random chance. It may be that the bible was not made up. But since it fails to exceed these statistic thresholds, (chi square tests), it really has no credibility other than just ancient stories passed along to successive generations.
Charles Darwin straightened things out.
--
MrDexter
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
Pumpurrnickel
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
The Bible is mostly a book about morality. Morality isn't an illusion it's a concept. If you disagree with that type of morality is another matter. Fact is karma is simply cuase and affect and much of the Bible is thought to be simple fables by Christianity anyways. A better debate is "Do you believe god or heaven is real". You really can't argue that a concept is fake. A concept is simply an idea, if someone had an idea it exists. It's an existing idea.
--
McBean
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
True, but now you have shifted the discussion away from its initial focus, which is the bible. Christianity, Judiasm, etc are related but separate issues.
Thank you for seeing reason and agreeing with me. I was never arguing what is testable or reliable. I was only looking for proof that the bible is made up, since you said it was. Which makes it ironic calling me "unlearned" when you're agreeing with me.
--
McBean
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
That's fine, but what exactly are we in agreement about?
--
Pumpurrnickel
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You said it's made up in your first comment. Then you said it may not be made up in your other most recent comment. That's what I was arguing. You don't know for sure if it's made up or not. You agreed with me. That's all I wanted to hear.
--
McBean
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I was hoping you would comment on testability and randomness thresholds. After all, science is my religion.
Lol