Oh, I see. He confused me a little there. It's funny when they try to appear smart by using pretentious language but end up showing the opposite thing by misusing it.
Hell is not a conjecture, it's a belief. I'm not in the mood to explain the difference, but those two are certainly not exchangeable.
You have continued to use and have incited others to use an Archaic term.
By your own admission, you have confirmed a belief in this.
Caution: You are beginning to show contempt. Further willful disregard will result in an Ethical Downgrade or Diminishment.
So, you think that what I wrote implies that I believe in hell? I'm not going to dignify that with an answer. Not because I have that much of a character, but because I'm too lazy to try and explain to you everything that's wrong with your response. I just don't think you're worth it. Sorry if this sounds condescending, I wouldn't know how to avoid it.
Wuu back there big fella, get control of that fucker and don't let it ride you.
Ask the nice man in the white coat for a happy pill rest up a little.
I meant, I like your humour. Now for the love of little baby assorted cheeses tripe, """"fuck off"""" and let me get some fucking sleep so I can destroy the world in sound mind.
Is it normal to think that Chinese should keep "One- Child Policy"?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Archaic.
Please refrain from using the term pertaining to a conjectural netherworld.
--
IDiGAFi
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Hum... I don't get it. What term? What conjectural netherworld? Are you OK brain-wise, or is it me?
--
Gravy
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You refer to hell as being a living being rather than a underworld for the spiritually dammed.
--
IDiGAFi
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Oh, I see. He confused me a little there. It's funny when they try to appear smart by using pretentious language but end up showing the opposite thing by misusing it.
Hell is not a conjecture, it's a belief. I'm not in the mood to explain the difference, but those two are certainly not exchangeable.
--
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-2
-2
Violation.
Please see Rule #8.
Infringement.
You have continued to use and have incited others to use an Archaic term.
By your own admission, you have confirmed a belief in this.
Caution: You are beginning to show contempt. Further willful disregard will result in an Ethical Downgrade or Diminishment.
--
Gravy
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
-
IDiGAFi
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
I like you humour.
So, you think that what I wrote implies that I believe in hell? I'm not going to dignify that with an answer. Not because I have that much of a character, but because I'm too lazy to try and explain to you everything that's wrong with your response. I just don't think you're worth it. Sorry if this sounds condescending, I wouldn't know how to avoid it.
--
Gravy
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
-
suckonthis9
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
See More Comments =>
Wuu back there big fella, get control of that fucker and don't let it ride you.
Ask the nice man in the white coat for a happy pill rest up a little.
I meant, I like your humour. Now for the love of little baby assorted cheeses tripe, """"fuck off"""" and let me get some fucking sleep so I can destroy the world in sound mind.
If you do not believe in something, then why do you continue to spread these Archaic concepts around?
By your own admission, you are indolent.
Please see Rule #3 & Rule #4, as well as Rule #15.
You have also admitted to condescending and contemptible behaviour. Please see Rule #10.
Violation.
Rape.
One more outburst will result in an Ethical Rating downgrade.