"That is because even if someone disagreed with segregation, their freedom to enter one of your single-race settlements would still be restricted. So segregation is inherently anti-freedom."
Open the doors of your house to absolutely anyone who wishes to enter. Then we'll talk.
What? That's a ridiculous comparison. Houses are private property with owners, but whole settlements aren't owned by anyone because they are not private property, and thus you have no right to stop people from entering them because of their race.
Is it normal to think segregation would've been better
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
"That is because even if someone disagreed with segregation, their freedom to enter one of your single-race settlements would still be restricted. So segregation is inherently anti-freedom."
Open the doors of your house to absolutely anyone who wishes to enter. Then we'll talk.
--
dom180
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
What? That's a ridiculous comparison. Houses are private property with owners, but whole settlements aren't owned by anyone because they are not private property, and thus you have no right to stop people from entering them because of their race.
--
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You forget that land can very much be private property.