Fair enough, but you contradict yourself. You are saying that women cannot love men unconditionally because they would only be attracted to a man who they perceive as superior and that love only stands as long as his status as protector and provider holds, no?
Therefore, by this logic, should such a man become dependent on the woman, she can then love him unconditionally, but will no longer be attracted to him.
IIN to think children first is a fallacy
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Fair enough, but you contradict yourself. You are saying that women cannot love men unconditionally because they would only be attracted to a man who they perceive as superior and that love only stands as long as his status as protector and provider holds, no?
Therefore, by this logic, should such a man become dependent on the woman, she can then love him unconditionally, but will no longer be attracted to him.