Those who lack a sexual urge is in my view just defective. Defective as in when you are in a tribe if one does not reproduce then your bloodline is lost. Thus you are defective in survival of your genes wise. Self survival is of course the number one priority... until you have kids that's when its shifts to number two.
That is what I'm saying! Evolution would have finished these people off by now! It makes no sense for a species to just have no sex drive. People like that would die off a long ass time ago with natural selection, if there even were asexual in the first place.
Is it normal to think "asexuality" is totally not a thing?
← View full post
Those who lack a sexual urge is in my view just defective. Defective as in when you are in a tribe if one does not reproduce then your bloodline is lost. Thus you are defective in survival of your genes wise. Self survival is of course the number one priority... until you have kids that's when its shifts to number two.
--
palehorse
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
Anonymous Post Author
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
So, do you also agree celibate people are also "defective"?
--
LloydAsher
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No that's a choice, that I am sure is hard to do. People who have a legitimate claim they feel no physcial need for sex are defective.
That is what I'm saying! Evolution would have finished these people off by now! It makes no sense for a species to just have no sex drive. People like that would die off a long ass time ago with natural selection, if there even were asexual in the first place.
--
palehorse
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
A single person, or a group of people, is not a species.
--
Anonymous Post Author
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Oops sorry, that was not what I meant to say. Forget the third sentence if my last comment.