Is it normal to think "asexuality" is totally not a thing?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

← View full post
Comments ( 8 ) Sort: best | oldest
  • So what? We just want a simple word to refer to the more lengthy meaning. That's how language works.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • I know it is not the most important thing ever, but I do think the term is misleading. All people have some small degree of sexual desire, and its the ones that never act on it that call themselves asexual. The term is misleading though.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Lol some people have no sex drive. Get over yourself.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • What makes you so convinced? Get back to me when you can prove it.....

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • Imagine someone walk up this guy and say, "I don't like music." And he's just like, "What do you mean you don't like music, you have ears! You need to PROVE you don't like music."

            Why does someone need to prove they're asexual? They don't want to have sex with anyone. Why is that something that needs to be proved?

            Comment Hidden ( show )
              -
            • Music is different! That makes you the third person to use an inadequate analogy. Are there such thing as "music hormones" that we all have that control our "music drive"???

              Comment Hidden ( show )
                -
              • We're trying to get you to understand how utterly absurd your view is.

                It has nothing to do with hormones - it's literally someone announcing their preference, and you in the corner like, "I don't BELIEVE you." What's it to you?

                Comment Hidden ( show )