It is possible to not be sexually attracted to either sex. Asexuals can still experience nonsexual (romantic) love though, which is one reason it’s as useful a label as gay or bi.
Well, I disagree! I do not think it is possible to have no attraction to either sex. Lots of people just have low sex drives and don't think sex or relationships are worth it, so they make up an orientation to give them an excuse and a cool thing to call themselves.
Your logical fallacy is: Burden of proof. you’re the one who claimed that asexuality isn’t real, although you did admit that is only your opinion and not a fact.
Fact: some people do not experience sexual attraction towards either sex. It has been named “Asexuality”.
Yes good point, I never claimed it as a fact. And I know this is a matter that can not be definitively proven one way or another. I believe it to be true but it is not a fact, and I have nothing against you for thinking otherwise. Its called a respectful disagreement ona theory. There is no conctere facts that can prove it either way.
I mean thats like saying lesbians don't exsist becuase you disagree with it. News flash, its thier chioce not yours. If they say they are into the same sex you don't get to say "well I don't belive. You must be fictional"!
The proof is that Asexuality exists though. You’re assuming they’re lying but have no reasoning behind that, other than you can’t imagine someone having different feelings than your own
Is it normal to think "asexuality" is totally not a thing?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Down to fuck; willing to have sex.
It is possible to not be sexually attracted to either sex. Asexuals can still experience nonsexual (romantic) love though, which is one reason it’s as useful a label as gay or bi.
--
Anonymous Post Author
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-3
-3
Well, I disagree! I do not think it is possible to have no attraction to either sex. Lots of people just have low sex drives and don't think sex or relationships are worth it, so they make up an orientation to give them an excuse and a cool thing to call themselves.
--
mauzi
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
Your feelings don’t change the facts, snowflake.
--
Anonymous Post Author
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
What facts? I have yet to see any facts, although I do appreciate the political jargon. What makes makes you belive that asexuality is a "fact"?
--
mauzi
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
What political jargon?
Your logical fallacy is: Burden of proof. you’re the one who claimed that asexuality isn’t real, although you did admit that is only your opinion and not a fact.
Fact: some people do not experience sexual attraction towards either sex. It has been named “Asexuality”.
--
Anonymous Post Author
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yes good point, I never claimed it as a fact. And I know this is a matter that can not be definitively proven one way or another. I believe it to be true but it is not a fact, and I have nothing against you for thinking otherwise. Its called a respectful disagreement ona theory. There is no conctere facts that can prove it either way.
--
NoLifer
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
See More Comments =>
-
mauzi
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
See More Comments =>
I mean thats like saying lesbians don't exsist becuase you disagree with it. News flash, its thier chioce not yours. If they say they are into the same sex you don't get to say "well I don't belive. You must be fictional"!
The proof is that Asexuality exists though. You’re assuming they’re lying but have no reasoning behind that, other than you can’t imagine someone having different feelings than your own