It can become necessary in certain circumstances, I'm not denying that. Just saying that cutting off a part of a penis whether there's something wrong with it or not isn't a good idea.
If there is an issue that can't be helped without surgical intervention - of course it should be done then.
I read it as you saying there was never a medical necessity, but on re reading, I can see how you must have meant the practice of doing it at birth. My bad.
IIN to surgically mutilate male sexual organs?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Nor should it be the norm.
It can become necessary in certain circumstances, I'm not denying that. Just saying that cutting off a part of a penis whether there's something wrong with it or not isn't a good idea.
If there is an issue that can't be helped without surgical intervention - of course it should be done then.
--
charli.m
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
I read it as you saying there was never a medical necessity, but on re reading, I can see how you must have meant the practice of doing it at birth. My bad.
--
Unimportant
6 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No worries, it was poorly worded on my part.