People don't dislike others just because they are smart. I think some more honest self-reflection may benefit you. And sure, no one else really has the right to tell you what to do, but what you HAVE TO do and what you SHOULD do are different things. I personally believe we are here in this life to love and serve others.
"I have found the paradox, that if you love until it hurts, there can be no more hurt, only more love." -Mother Teresa
I think it's possible that morality was the problem, but my immoralism doesn't work, the old morality what I had as a fancy person in the first place is sure to work. It's painful for people to admit, but all the worst of me, all the evil they're paranoid about, isn't there, all I am now is a fancy person who's in on one path followed: fancy, with believing in only the posh philosophies for its own sake, I always thought that was good. That literally means I'm a wine purist, a jazz, swing, waltz and classical music purist, a lexical purist, illegalist, aestheticist, pessimist, misanthrope, misogynist, Hegellian, quantitative hedonist, royalist, regalist, and holy and unholy man and that's it, the way it has been before (with the addition of Hegel and lexical purism), it's simple, I only follow one path, along with my political beliefs. I believe mostly posh things. I know what I should do, that is, if my morality, including honesty, got me in trouble, if my morals, which is an embarrassment of riches, never got me privileges, even my gentlemanliness, then it was what I had to do and not what I should do, I should be an immoralist, because now I'm convinced there's no beauty, no decency in doing the right thing, the right thing isn't dignified and nobody honours it, therefore my colourful invention works, nobody cares but if I went out in public immoral I wouldn't get hurt, or made to feel guilty, and people stop giving me a hard time, I have reason to be immoral.
Is it normal to make up your own immoralism?
← View full post
People don't dislike others just because they are smart. I think some more honest self-reflection may benefit you. And sure, no one else really has the right to tell you what to do, but what you HAVE TO do and what you SHOULD do are different things. I personally believe we are here in this life to love and serve others.
"I have found the paradox, that if you love until it hurts, there can be no more hurt, only more love." -Mother Teresa
--
Hansberger
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I think it's possible that morality was the problem, but my immoralism doesn't work, the old morality what I had as a fancy person in the first place is sure to work. It's painful for people to admit, but all the worst of me, all the evil they're paranoid about, isn't there, all I am now is a fancy person who's in on one path followed: fancy, with believing in only the posh philosophies for its own sake, I always thought that was good. That literally means I'm a wine purist, a jazz, swing, waltz and classical music purist, a lexical purist, illegalist, aestheticist, pessimist, misanthrope, misogynist, Hegellian, quantitative hedonist, royalist, regalist, and holy and unholy man and that's it, the way it has been before (with the addition of Hegel and lexical purism), it's simple, I only follow one path, along with my political beliefs. I believe mostly posh things. I know what I should do, that is, if my morality, including honesty, got me in trouble, if my morals, which is an embarrassment of riches, never got me privileges, even my gentlemanliness, then it was what I had to do and not what I should do, I should be an immoralist, because now I'm convinced there's no beauty, no decency in doing the right thing, the right thing isn't dignified and nobody honours it, therefore my colourful invention works, nobody cares but if I went out in public immoral I wouldn't get hurt, or made to feel guilty, and people stop giving me a hard time, I have reason to be immoral.