Spelling and grammar is a different. Not being able to speak in a way that makes sense is another. Nobody says 'That of which'. Go ahead and correct anything of mine that you wish.
No I'm just wondering where your argument went. In my experience someone who goes out of their way to critique another person grammatical or spelling issues (as long as they aren't unreadable) is simply trying to change subject because of the loss of the initial argument. It's like saying "Oh, shit. This guys has a point. I don't know how to argue back so I'm going to point out his personal flaws!". Not to mention the fact that you responded directly to my "flawed" quote, meaning you understood it, yet wanted to point it out to make yourself look somehow more intelligent, which it does not. Besides, I'm still not sure what you dub wrong about the term "that of which". It was used as a correct interjection, and is a phase with endless possibilities in the way it is said. So, if you would please:
Okay, I am back from fucking myself. Had a great time. "That of which" should have been "of which" or simply "which". All that silliness aside, you still don't undertand that he says those thing tounge in cheek. That was my only point and it was not pointless. When you get back from licking your own nipples, I will read your reply.
Is it normal to LOVE The Daily Show and Colbert Report?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Do you want me to go back and correct your grammatical abilities?
--
anti-hero
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Spelling and grammar is a different. Not being able to speak in a way that makes sense is another. Nobody says 'That of which'. Go ahead and correct anything of mine that you wish.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No I'm just wondering where your argument went. In my experience someone who goes out of their way to critique another person grammatical or spelling issues (as long as they aren't unreadable) is simply trying to change subject because of the loss of the initial argument. It's like saying "Oh, shit. This guys has a point. I don't know how to argue back so I'm going to point out his personal flaws!". Not to mention the fact that you responded directly to my "flawed" quote, meaning you understood it, yet wanted to point it out to make yourself look somehow more intelligent, which it does not. Besides, I'm still not sure what you dub wrong about the term "that of which". It was used as a correct interjection, and is a phase with endless possibilities in the way it is said. So, if you would please:
Go fuck yourself.
--
anti-hero
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Okay, I am back from fucking myself. Had a great time. "That of which" should have been "of which" or simply "which". All that silliness aside, you still don't undertand that he says those thing tounge in cheek. That was my only point and it was not pointless. When you get back from licking your own nipples, I will read your reply.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
*things
You just lost all validity.
--
anti-hero
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
There is a difference between a typo and not knowing how to speak. You lost all validity before me then. haha