I do math problems, therefore I exist. But could math problems in my dreams be twisted by a Great Deceiver? Furthermore, would the Ultimate Force of the Universe (we'll say "the Great Mathematician" for the sake of argument) allow him to deceive to this extent? How do I even know an Ultimate Force of the Universe even exists?
Ontological argument: If I conceive of perfection that does not exist, it is no longer perfect. The Great Mathematician then strikes down the evil deceiver, and I proceed knowing my 2.7 kelvin data is good stuff.
BTW, this whole thing was a pretty quick realization - Shakespeare had some really cool language about dreams.
Is it normal to live in a paradox?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Logical justification? I'll accept empirical justification. Why don't you philosophers talk about 2.7 Kelvin black-body radiation.
-------
Kid1: Nah nah. The highest number is a googolplex.
Kid2: Oh yeh, I know a higher number. googolplex + 1.
--
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Alright mr. math/hard-science guy, use empirical data to prove that you aren't dreaming right now.
--
dude_Jones
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I do math problems, therefore I exist. But could math problems in my dreams be twisted by a Great Deceiver? Furthermore, would the Ultimate Force of the Universe (we'll say "the Great Mathematician" for the sake of argument) allow him to deceive to this extent? How do I even know an Ultimate Force of the Universe even exists?
Ontological argument: If I conceive of perfection that does not exist, it is no longer perfect. The Great Mathematician then strikes down the evil deceiver, and I proceed knowing my 2.7 kelvin data is good stuff.
BTW, this whole thing was a pretty quick realization - Shakespeare had some really cool language about dreams.