We presume everything is created by something, we presume everything has a beginning. However this is only theory. It's difficult to comprehend, but it's perfectly possible that there is and always had been something. In other words there was never a start to everything and there will probably never be an end either. The universe may simply be an endless, continuous shifting of all matter and energy, and we happen to be one of an unlimited amount of consequences to that chaos.
Existence is not an impossibility, not everything must have a beginning. Simple... Sort of :)
You're implying there must be some justification, some idea behind it all, some universal reason.
Why must there be a reason? We are guided in life by our powers of reasoning, but the mechanisms of humanity aren't applicable to everything in existence. Who's to say the universe isn't simply here and always has been?
But this argument doesn't abide by causality principles, and therefore has no logical structure and is unsubstantiated. But the inverse cannot be proven either, and so goes the paradox
You're right that neither theories can be proven. However causality doesn't require that there be a beginning, only that there be something before, so there is logical structure if we assumed the infinity of the universe is true.
True, but there is no logical justification for infinity so its like making an argument for something that you're assuming in that argument. But thats all of existentialism.
Is it normal to live in a paradox?
← View full post
It's not necessarily a paradox.
We presume everything is created by something, we presume everything has a beginning. However this is only theory. It's difficult to comprehend, but it's perfectly possible that there is and always had been something. In other words there was never a start to everything and there will probably never be an end either. The universe may simply be an endless, continuous shifting of all matter and energy, and we happen to be one of an unlimited amount of consequences to that chaos.
Existence is not an impossibility, not everything must have a beginning. Simple... Sort of :)
--
Anonymous Post Author
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
If things had no beginning why is it here?
--
disthing
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
You're implying there must be some justification, some idea behind it all, some universal reason.
Why must there be a reason? We are guided in life by our powers of reasoning, but the mechanisms of humanity aren't applicable to everything in existence. Who's to say the universe isn't simply here and always has been?
--
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
But this argument doesn't abide by causality principles, and therefore has no logical structure and is unsubstantiated. But the inverse cannot be proven either, and so goes the paradox
--
disthing
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You're right that neither theories can be proven. However causality doesn't require that there be a beginning, only that there be something before, so there is logical structure if we assumed the infinity of the universe is true.
--
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
True, but there is no logical justification for infinity so its like making an argument for something that you're assuming in that argument. But thats all of existentialism.
--
dude_Jones
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Logical justification? I'll accept empirical justification. Why don't you philosophers talk about 2.7 Kelvin black-body radiation.
-------
Kid1: Nah nah. The highest number is a googolplex.
Kid2: Oh yeh, I know a higher number. googolplex + 1.