Trying to look at it dispassionately, I guess the difference in opinion is how much defence capability someone needs. I think a semi-automatic is more than is required.
To ask an interesting question, would you support stronger gun laws if an equally effective (but non-lethal) protective device was readily available?
Also semi-automatic weapons fire once every time you bull the trigger. How is this to much, I could see full-auto being to much. But one bullet at a time?
Depends on the law. I have think they need full mental evaluation before they can get a gun. What would the equity effective but non-lethal substitute be (is it beanbag, knife, baseball bat, ect.)
Is it normal to have semi-automatic guns?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Trying to look at it dispassionately, I guess the difference in opinion is how much defence capability someone needs. I think a semi-automatic is more than is required.
To ask an interesting question, would you support stronger gun laws if an equally effective (but non-lethal) protective device was readily available?
--
Matt2222
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
toofgod
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
Matt2222
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Also semi-automatic weapons fire once every time you bull the trigger. How is this to much, I could see full-auto being to much. But one bullet at a time?
"dappled" did not use proper "sentencing" therefore should NOT be answered. Conclusion: "dappled" OWNED Matt2222.
Depends on the law. I have think they need full mental evaluation before they can get a gun. What would the equity effective but non-lethal substitute be (is it beanbag, knife, baseball bat, ect.)