Is it normal to have semi-automatic guns?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

↑ View this comment's parent

← View full post
Comments ( 5 ) Sort: best | oldest
  • Apples and oranges. Guns (in the hands of sane normal people) save lives and money. Break-ins, robbery, ect. Can be prevented or ended quickly with guns. An even better reason then that the bad guys (person or government) will always be able to get guns, and having the ability to defend yourself (and use the second amendment) will be needed.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Trying to look at it dispassionately, I guess the difference in opinion is how much defence capability someone needs. I think a semi-automatic is more than is required.

      To ask an interesting question, would you support stronger gun laws if an equally effective (but non-lethal) protective device was readily available?

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Also semi-automatic weapons fire once every time you bull the trigger. How is this to much, I could see full-auto being to much. But one bullet at a time?

        Comment Hidden ( show )
      • "dappled" did not use proper "sentencing" therefore should NOT be answered. Conclusion: "dappled" OWNED Matt2222.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
      • Depends on the law. I have think they need full mental evaluation before they can get a gun. What would the equity effective but non-lethal substitute be (is it beanbag, knife, baseball bat, ect.)

        Comment Hidden ( show )