I am being completely serious with the above, and would like that you contribute something with a bit more intellectual rigor, rather than make bizarre accusations against my character.
informal
make a deliberately offensive or provocative online posting with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them
What you have essentially said is "I hate people who, for the whole history of our species, have improved human existence." Your evidence for such a profound claim was anecdotal and anecdotal evidence is not evidence. It's difficult to come up with a message more deliberately offensive or provocative than that.
Given your post's stark resemblance to the above definition, your trollery is by definition obvious. Therefore, I disagree. "Obvious troll is obvious . . . " was all that needed saying. It perfectly summed up my feelings about your post. Lastly, no, intellectual rigor is not a phrase I would deem applicable to your post.
I sincerely(not really) hope you respond with, "at least I was thinking for myself."
Again, 'think for themselves' is in quotations FOR A FUCKING REASON, YOU DIPSHIT. Whenever you don't buy into some other idiot's conspiracy, his first tactic is to whine that you should 'think for yourself' (or better yet 'think outside (and by outside, I mean 'my') box'). 'Intellectual rigor' is not a phrase I would deem applicable to your mother drinking while she was pregnant with your stupid ass. Tell me, instead of picking up a book on evolutionary biology, why don't you just engage in a little 'individual thought' and advance the notion that we are made of ice-cream??
I'm not even trying, I'm simply vitriolic that I have to explain things that should be simple and easy to grasp to a moron with an obvious intellectual disability.
IIN to hate people who "think for themselves?"
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
I am being completely serious with the above, and would like that you contribute something with a bit more intellectual rigor, rather than make bizarre accusations against my character.
--
ArmusWasTheFirstTroll
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Troll
informal
make a deliberately offensive or provocative online posting with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them
What you have essentially said is "I hate people who, for the whole history of our species, have improved human existence." Your evidence for such a profound claim was anecdotal and anecdotal evidence is not evidence. It's difficult to come up with a message more deliberately offensive or provocative than that.
Given your post's stark resemblance to the above definition, your trollery is by definition obvious. Therefore, I disagree. "Obvious troll is obvious . . . " was all that needed saying. It perfectly summed up my feelings about your post. Lastly, no, intellectual rigor is not a phrase I would deem applicable to your post.
I sincerely(not really) hope you respond with, "at least I was thinking for myself."
--
Anonymous Post Author
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Again, 'think for themselves' is in quotations FOR A FUCKING REASON, YOU DIPSHIT. Whenever you don't buy into some other idiot's conspiracy, his first tactic is to whine that you should 'think for yourself' (or better yet 'think outside (and by outside, I mean 'my') box'). 'Intellectual rigor' is not a phrase I would deem applicable to your mother drinking while she was pregnant with your stupid ass. Tell me, instead of picking up a book on evolutionary biology, why don't you just engage in a little 'individual thought' and advance the notion that we are made of ice-cream??
--
ArmusWasTheFirstTroll
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Trolling should just be able to flow. Like wiping your ass with silk. You try too hard.
--
Anonymous Post Author
8 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I'm not even trying, I'm simply vitriolic that I have to explain things that should be simple and easy to grasp to a moron with an obvious intellectual disability.