Oh boy, record numbers of innocent civilians in Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and Pakistan. Well over 1,000. Actually so far I think its over 30,000 bombs now the U.S. has dropped this year, and the amount of drone strikes has increased as well
If you care to look into it you'll find the US military presence in the middle east has only increased the amount of terrorism. You'll see our interest has been in oil and not peacekeeping. There are many atrocities occurring that are far more dangerous than ISIS that the US could care less about preventing. You will find as well that some of our programs there have just a 10% chance of killing the intended target. If you choose to disregard this info though you should love HRC for her expansion of Obama's drone campaign.
And yes I want our troops to come home. I just dont want ISIS killing innocent people.
If we could bring our troops home and give support to other countries for dealing with ISIS, thatd be fine with me. As long as ISIS can be taken care of and doesnt hurt other people.
Two points to that. Firstly our involvement in the middle east has only increased terrorism. ISIS itself is using weapons supplied by the US. Secondly statistically, your first point shouldn't be made sarcastically. The US govt has killed far far more innocent people than the Taliban and ISIS combined.
IIN to hate Hillary Rotten Clinton and her stupid book too?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Oh boy, record numbers of innocent civilians in Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and Pakistan. Well over 1,000. Actually so far I think its over 30,000 bombs now the U.S. has dropped this year, and the amount of drone strikes has increased as well
--
redrainbow22
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
BlackCatsAreAwesome
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I really dont know much, but if we need them for ISIS then thats really the only reason to have them over there, as much as I can see.
--
rayb12
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
If you care to look into it you'll find the US military presence in the middle east has only increased the amount of terrorism. You'll see our interest has been in oil and not peacekeeping. There are many atrocities occurring that are far more dangerous than ISIS that the US could care less about preventing. You will find as well that some of our programs there have just a 10% chance of killing the intended target. If you choose to disregard this info though you should love HRC for her expansion of Obama's drone campaign.
--
redrainbow22
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Of course I dont like Hillary Clinton!
And yes I want our troops to come home. I just dont want ISIS killing innocent people.
If we could bring our troops home and give support to other countries for dealing with ISIS, thatd be fine with me. As long as ISIS can be taken care of and doesnt hurt other people.
Oh the alternatives like ISIS and the taleban etc are so much better and should not be opposed.
--
rayb12
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Two points to that. Firstly our involvement in the middle east has only increased terrorism. ISIS itself is using weapons supplied by the US. Secondly statistically, your first point shouldn't be made sarcastically. The US govt has killed far far more innocent people than the Taliban and ISIS combined.
--
bob7
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I fully agree
If not for the US greed , most of the "terrorist" organizations wouldnt have been formed in the first place
--
BlackCatsAreAwesome
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Al Qaeda & ISIS, probably not, but the taleban would have.
--
bob7
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
al qaeda the main one lol