Yes, the person telling you to present your position and prove your point is wanting to only speak. Nice "logic" there. Something tells me our standards of "logic" differentiate, so much so that your comment about logic, from your standpoint of what it seems to be, isn't all that insulting now that I think about it.
"Also, I lack the time, patience, and interest to deal with insolent people who like to cloud and muddle issues."
Then shut up and don't initiate. You say "I" am the one that is only interested in being heard, yet here you are backing out of the situation because I didn't agree with you and offered rebuttals.
"Agree with me or you are wrong and I am taking my ball and myself home".
"Insolent". Oh, wow. Surprise, surprise. You act like an arrogant asshat, attempt to insult me, then all of a sudden when I meet your negativity with my own, oh lord, I am "insolent".
Sorry, but you are beneath me on this type of thing, you just are. You're too hypocritical, not to mention inept (don't try and insult my intelligence with the "I lack the patience and don't have the time" line, you and I both know you bit off more than you could chew, and that is shown by how you seem to have the time and patience to read my response and then respond to that response with why you are not going to keep on the discussion you initiated. Again, don't take me for the fool you are.
You can't prove your point, so you have no point. You know that logic thing you spoke of? Well, by my terms, if you can't prove something, then you're wrong. I don't know if that complies with "your" idea of what logic is, but that certainly is the standard for anyone that understands logic.
"Just like Limbaugh, when you must resort to name calling you have lost the debate. Try not to be so emotional."
Name calling is just a blunt form of insulting, a behavior "you" initiated with this comment: "Yeah, logic doesn't seem to work well on you either."
You think you can give that behavior then cry when it is returned? Sorry, once again you have displayed yourself the utter moron you are. You initate conversations, then back out the second your points are refuted, claiming that the opposition is the wrong one all while being incapable of proving so under the excuse of not having the time or patience (which again, you read my whole comment and responded, showing you do), initiate the insulting, then say "No, no, you lost, you insulted me. Wah."
You lost. Unless you prove me wrong, you have nothing to offer. Do not respond to me and waste that "precious" time and patience, it'll do you the favor of not wasting your time thinking you can prove yourself correct while not actually proving your point, and it will save me the horror of having to read it and have someone that thinks that is how rational people think they can belittle the intelligence of others.
You have no room to speak of logic, and do me a favor and don't respond to me again, not just here, anywhere. The results will be the same, you starting something, me proving you wrong, you backing out while claiming you are right like a child.
You're new here, so you're making the same mistake most on here learned. What you "think" is "rage", or whatever, is me simply explaining my negative view of you, not raging over the computer, again, most tend to assume how I express my views as someone raging, but they learned it wasn't, not too sure if you'd catch that on your own, so I took the liberty.
Don't assume you have what it takes to "get my panties in a bundle". You don't. You're just an imbecile that bit off more than they can chew, now you're looking for scrapes at the bottom of the barrel. You couldn't win intellectually, now you've convinced yourself you've somehow won in an emotional maturity because you feel like you need to show superiority in some sense. It's sad and funny at the same time, really.
D'aww, how sweet. He's trying to be witty to compensate for his intellectual inferiority. Please, do tell me some more cliche jokes that are totally not overplayed. Perhaps a yo mamma joke?
That's the best you can do? The way you talk yourself up I was expecting so much more. Your opinion of yourself is overinflated...please do continue your mental masturbation.
Is it normal to hate females so much that I am embarressed to be one?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
No, the difference between me & you is that you are more interested in being heard than to being open to potentially learning anything.
Also, I lack the time, patience, and interest to deal with insolent people who like to cloud and muddle issues.
Just like Limbaugh, when you must resort to name calling you have lost the debate. Try not to be so emotional.
--
[Old Memory]
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yes, the person telling you to present your position and prove your point is wanting to only speak. Nice "logic" there. Something tells me our standards of "logic" differentiate, so much so that your comment about logic, from your standpoint of what it seems to be, isn't all that insulting now that I think about it.
"Also, I lack the time, patience, and interest to deal with insolent people who like to cloud and muddle issues."
Then shut up and don't initiate. You say "I" am the one that is only interested in being heard, yet here you are backing out of the situation because I didn't agree with you and offered rebuttals.
"Agree with me or you are wrong and I am taking my ball and myself home".
"Insolent". Oh, wow. Surprise, surprise. You act like an arrogant asshat, attempt to insult me, then all of a sudden when I meet your negativity with my own, oh lord, I am "insolent".
Sorry, but you are beneath me on this type of thing, you just are. You're too hypocritical, not to mention inept (don't try and insult my intelligence with the "I lack the patience and don't have the time" line, you and I both know you bit off more than you could chew, and that is shown by how you seem to have the time and patience to read my response and then respond to that response with why you are not going to keep on the discussion you initiated. Again, don't take me for the fool you are.
You can't prove your point, so you have no point. You know that logic thing you spoke of? Well, by my terms, if you can't prove something, then you're wrong. I don't know if that complies with "your" idea of what logic is, but that certainly is the standard for anyone that understands logic.
"Just like Limbaugh, when you must resort to name calling you have lost the debate. Try not to be so emotional."
Name calling is just a blunt form of insulting, a behavior "you" initiated with this comment: "Yeah, logic doesn't seem to work well on you either."
You think you can give that behavior then cry when it is returned? Sorry, once again you have displayed yourself the utter moron you are. You initate conversations, then back out the second your points are refuted, claiming that the opposition is the wrong one all while being incapable of proving so under the excuse of not having the time or patience (which again, you read my whole comment and responded, showing you do), initiate the insulting, then say "No, no, you lost, you insulted me. Wah."
You lost. Unless you prove me wrong, you have nothing to offer. Do not respond to me and waste that "precious" time and patience, it'll do you the favor of not wasting your time thinking you can prove yourself correct while not actually proving your point, and it will save me the horror of having to read it and have someone that thinks that is how rational people think they can belittle the intelligence of others.
You have no room to speak of logic, and do me a favor and don't respond to me again, not just here, anywhere. The results will be the same, you starting something, me proving you wrong, you backing out while claiming you are right like a child.
Ta.
--
CozmoWank
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
My goodness, your panties seem to be in a bundle.
--
[Old Memory]
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You're new here, so you're making the same mistake most on here learned. What you "think" is "rage", or whatever, is me simply explaining my negative view of you, not raging over the computer, again, most tend to assume how I express my views as someone raging, but they learned it wasn't, not too sure if you'd catch that on your own, so I took the liberty.
Don't assume you have what it takes to "get my panties in a bundle". You don't. You're just an imbecile that bit off more than they can chew, now you're looking for scrapes at the bottom of the barrel. You couldn't win intellectually, now you've convinced yourself you've somehow won in an emotional maturity because you feel like you need to show superiority in some sense. It's sad and funny at the same time, really.
--
CozmoWank
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
So you haven't had much success with the Midol, have you tried taking Pamprin?
--
[Old Memory]
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
D'aww, how sweet. He's trying to be witty to compensate for his intellectual inferiority. Please, do tell me some more cliche jokes that are totally not overplayed. Perhaps a yo mamma joke?
Lmao. Jesus.
--
CozmoWank
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
That's the best you can do? The way you talk yourself up I was expecting so much more. Your opinion of yourself is overinflated...please do continue your mental masturbation.