Ok then our communication is inutile since we have different and contradictory systems. I will never believe that what helped us develop ourselves in a spectacular manner, including your own access to this website to say that is wrong, is bullshit, but what internet chatrooms tell me is right and "step out" of science books to believe an obscure world is the right way and I should be a useless ignorant rejecting science and inventing my own theories out of frustration, like about gender and friendship, since are so popular among liberals now. That sounds like a test you want me to take, like those guys who were told by other people on the internet to kill themselves and they did. Science is always the correct way to go, and whoever thinks something else cannot understand this because their system does not allow that by being against it. Like trying to update the latest Linux on a Windows machine. Also you state that science always changes, which is wrong and shows that you didn't fully comprehend it, which is a stronger reason to reject your claim. Science is always the same, no matter what you do. You just write it differently, but it's the same and even Descartes demonstrated that.q
Science and math break down at the level of quantum mechanics which is the level this topic was discussing really. You can continue to believe it answers everything but we both know it doesn't. Math is a human construct and fails at human limits. I wish more people could understand that instead of resorting to calling me ignorant. I guess when peoples foundations are questioned it's natural to get defensive.
There is nothing to understand. You have no truths, just claims. You bring nothing to support your evidence, just random crumbs of information put together to look like they form a unity. Which probably is a result of gathering informations in the same disoriented way, reading a couple of pages and articles from here and there and then you feel like that makes sense so it's good enough to bring it.
I didn't say that science answers everything, this is your claim and you fight a strawman there. You took my rejection of science being bullshit to science being everything, and you keep fighting extremes for no reason, but not fighting my arguments. There is no such thing as "we both know this", since it is obvious that you don't know either the true value of science or my own claims and assumptions, because you keep going around them to argue with me. Also this makes me believe that what you actually know about quantum physics is what you saw on a youtube video or a random article that begs attention just as their creators do.
I do not use my natural instincts of defending science, but you use your natural instincts to make your random claims, because it is obvious that you intentionally distort and select extreme views just to make your argument look stronger. Instead, I never did that, I presented the true and genuine scientifical view of things.
I can use my instincts instead and say I personally believe that such claims are insane and used by fake scientists who beg for attention since they are totally incapable of understanding it, but they use internet chatrooms to claim that the world is not what we think it is and shit. Also, some of the answers of the greatest questions are much more likely and obviously found (if we truly have them) in critical and scientifical research made in years of hard work by geniuses, not on a fucking internet chatroom that makes everyone an "expert" nowadays. This is my natural instinct towards this, but as you can see, I don't use it since I have scientifical and objective means of proving you wrong. I call you an ignorant because you truly dismiss science and it is easily seen in your argument, not because I feel like it. Human construct is your pure invention and it's obvious that you can't handle this concept. You just use it to feel that you have a strong conclusion, but you don't, so you make up terms to seem like you have a point of reference. Also, my instincts tell me that "construct" is a theory invented by people to fake their true ignorance and lack of knowledge, so that they do whatever the hell nowadays. Just because it sounds good or logical it doesn't mean it is. But, whatever.
Nope because I didn't use that in the argument. What I use to argue against you is the strawman. You made it, you lost. Now you try to use it again, while I specifically mentioned that I won't use it in the debate, it doesn't serve as an attack, it's just what I believe. Ok I will never be convinced that my entire career is "bullshit" by someone on the internet so whatever. The end.
IIN to get like a sensation that life isn't real
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Except my argument is that science is bullshit. So is math. You already know that. I can tell.
--
[Old Memory]
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Ok then our communication is inutile since we have different and contradictory systems. I will never believe that what helped us develop ourselves in a spectacular manner, including your own access to this website to say that is wrong, is bullshit, but what internet chatrooms tell me is right and "step out" of science books to believe an obscure world is the right way and I should be a useless ignorant rejecting science and inventing my own theories out of frustration, like about gender and friendship, since are so popular among liberals now. That sounds like a test you want me to take, like those guys who were told by other people on the internet to kill themselves and they did. Science is always the correct way to go, and whoever thinks something else cannot understand this because their system does not allow that by being against it. Like trying to update the latest Linux on a Windows machine. Also you state that science always changes, which is wrong and shows that you didn't fully comprehend it, which is a stronger reason to reject your claim. Science is always the same, no matter what you do. You just write it differently, but it's the same and even Descartes demonstrated that.q
--
nikkiclaire
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Science and math break down at the level of quantum mechanics which is the level this topic was discussing really. You can continue to believe it answers everything but we both know it doesn't. Math is a human construct and fails at human limits. I wish more people could understand that instead of resorting to calling me ignorant. I guess when peoples foundations are questioned it's natural to get defensive.
--
[Old Memory]
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
There is nothing to understand. You have no truths, just claims. You bring nothing to support your evidence, just random crumbs of information put together to look like they form a unity. Which probably is a result of gathering informations in the same disoriented way, reading a couple of pages and articles from here and there and then you feel like that makes sense so it's good enough to bring it.
I didn't say that science answers everything, this is your claim and you fight a strawman there. You took my rejection of science being bullshit to science being everything, and you keep fighting extremes for no reason, but not fighting my arguments. There is no such thing as "we both know this", since it is obvious that you don't know either the true value of science or my own claims and assumptions, because you keep going around them to argue with me. Also this makes me believe that what you actually know about quantum physics is what you saw on a youtube video or a random article that begs attention just as their creators do.
I do not use my natural instincts of defending science, but you use your natural instincts to make your random claims, because it is obvious that you intentionally distort and select extreme views just to make your argument look stronger. Instead, I never did that, I presented the true and genuine scientifical view of things.
I can use my instincts instead and say I personally believe that such claims are insane and used by fake scientists who beg for attention since they are totally incapable of understanding it, but they use internet chatrooms to claim that the world is not what we think it is and shit. Also, some of the answers of the greatest questions are much more likely and obviously found (if we truly have them) in critical and scientifical research made in years of hard work by geniuses, not on a fucking internet chatroom that makes everyone an "expert" nowadays. This is my natural instinct towards this, but as you can see, I don't use it since I have scientifical and objective means of proving you wrong. I call you an ignorant because you truly dismiss science and it is easily seen in your argument, not because I feel like it. Human construct is your pure invention and it's obvious that you can't handle this concept. You just use it to feel that you have a strong conclusion, but you don't, so you make up terms to seem like you have a point of reference. Also, my instincts tell me that "construct" is a theory invented by people to fake their true ignorance and lack of knowledge, so that they do whatever the hell nowadays. Just because it sounds good or logical it doesn't mean it is. But, whatever.
--
nikkiclaire
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Like I said defensive. All about putting me down. Ad hominem I believe sp?. I think the dkscussion has run it's course.
--
[Old Memory]
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Nope because I didn't use that in the argument. What I use to argue against you is the strawman. You made it, you lost. Now you try to use it again, while I specifically mentioned that I won't use it in the debate, it doesn't serve as an attack, it's just what I believe. Ok I will never be convinced that my entire career is "bullshit" by someone on the internet so whatever. The end.