Not going to lie, I thought this would of been specificly directed to me for the few debates I've been having recently.
All in all, I still think the best way to avoid people like these are to not intentionally read comments by such people or go on stories and polls that are bound to do such things.
I am a bit of a self righteous and judgemental person, and I can understand why people would see me as such. But I still think it's the person's choice to read such things those people give out on this site.
There are quite a few I see as annoing, self-righteous, judgmental people, but I still think that if it's something they strongly believe, they have the right to speak about it. Only when they start avoiding facts, and avoid answering questions in which would prove they're wrong do I think they need to stop starting things they aren't willing to finnish just because certain things come up.
I love hearing different opinions and am fond of debate myself. No problems with that.
My issue is with people who call people sick or perverted for the most ordinary foibles. Just because it's something they personally would not do. Or because someone chose a different way of life to them and they do not approve of this, rendering them unable to give an objective reply. I am not saying they have to agree or anything like that. I love a spirited debate.
Answerers on this thread have also assumed I refer to long posts, when this is not, in fact, the case at all. I suppose that's my own fault as people see "lecture" as "lengthy" when in fact I meant it as the dictionary version "formal reproof" not a long discourse.
IIN to get annoyed at the self-righteous judgemental posters here?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Not going to lie, I thought this would of been specificly directed to me for the few debates I've been having recently.
All in all, I still think the best way to avoid people like these are to not intentionally read comments by such people or go on stories and polls that are bound to do such things.
I am a bit of a self righteous and judgemental person, and I can understand why people would see me as such. But I still think it's the person's choice to read such things those people give out on this site.
There are quite a few I see as annoing, self-righteous, judgmental people, but I still think that if it's something they strongly believe, they have the right to speak about it. Only when they start avoiding facts, and avoid answering questions in which would prove they're wrong do I think they need to stop starting things they aren't willing to finnish just because certain things come up.
Thanks for the favourite comment.
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
That's cool :)
I love hearing different opinions and am fond of debate myself. No problems with that.
My issue is with people who call people sick or perverted for the most ordinary foibles. Just because it's something they personally would not do. Or because someone chose a different way of life to them and they do not approve of this, rendering them unable to give an objective reply. I am not saying they have to agree or anything like that. I love a spirited debate.
Answerers on this thread have also assumed I refer to long posts, when this is not, in fact, the case at all. I suppose that's my own fault as people see "lecture" as "lengthy" when in fact I meant it as the dictionary version "formal reproof" not a long discourse.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yeah, I agree.