It's part of what the site is for. Nobody is asking you to read them.
I am probably one of these people you see as annoying, self-righteous, judgemental posters. But what's even more annoying is when someone is complaining about such people when they don't have to read it.
If you don't like the subject, the person, or what's being said, then remove your eyes from the discussion, it's that simple.
Yeah but despite being "annoying, self-righteous, etc." (which is all subjective, anyway) you put the effort into your comments to present a viewpoint and support it.
If people aren't content with that, and can't give the same in return, what's the point in even sharing?
The real problem in my opinion is that... some people use this site *NOT* to ask if something's normal... but to attempt to justify their own bad behavior.
For example I just read a story where a girl's trying to complain about her dad punishing her and how she's over 18. Yet from her own statements on what she did... she was acting more like a 5 year old than an 18 year old.
So, we're suppose to agree with her... why?
It's OK to tell someone something they don't want to hear. This site is "is it normal", not "agree with me!"
Hey, just to clear this up right now. You are one of my FAVORITE posters here and the way you handle idiots is epic. I am not referring to you at all :)
Not going to lie, I thought this would of been specificly directed to me for the few debates I've been having recently.
All in all, I still think the best way to avoid people like these are to not intentionally read comments by such people or go on stories and polls that are bound to do such things.
I am a bit of a self righteous and judgemental person, and I can understand why people would see me as such. But I still think it's the person's choice to read such things those people give out on this site.
There are quite a few I see as annoing, self-righteous, judgmental people, but I still think that if it's something they strongly believe, they have the right to speak about it. Only when they start avoiding facts, and avoid answering questions in which would prove they're wrong do I think they need to stop starting things they aren't willing to finnish just because certain things come up.
I love hearing different opinions and am fond of debate myself. No problems with that.
My issue is with people who call people sick or perverted for the most ordinary foibles. Just because it's something they personally would not do. Or because someone chose a different way of life to them and they do not approve of this, rendering them unable to give an objective reply. I am not saying they have to agree or anything like that. I love a spirited debate.
Answerers on this thread have also assumed I refer to long posts, when this is not, in fact, the case at all. I suppose that's my own fault as people see "lecture" as "lengthy" when in fact I meant it as the dictionary version "formal reproof" not a long discourse.
IIN to get annoyed at the self-righteous judgemental posters here?
← View full post
Apologies. < Sarcasm.
It's part of what the site is for. Nobody is asking you to read them.
I am probably one of these people you see as annoying, self-righteous, judgemental posters. But what's even more annoying is when someone is complaining about such people when they don't have to read it.
If you don't like the subject, the person, or what's being said, then remove your eyes from the discussion, it's that simple.
--
PumpkinKate
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
2
2
-
Angel_in_a_Glass_Dress
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yeah but despite being "annoying, self-righteous, etc." (which is all subjective, anyway) you put the effort into your comments to present a viewpoint and support it.
If people aren't content with that, and can't give the same in return, what's the point in even sharing?
I probably am to.
The real problem in my opinion is that... some people use this site *NOT* to ask if something's normal... but to attempt to justify their own bad behavior.
For example I just read a story where a girl's trying to complain about her dad punishing her and how she's over 18. Yet from her own statements on what she did... she was acting more like a 5 year old than an 18 year old.
So, we're suppose to agree with her... why?
It's OK to tell someone something they don't want to hear. This site is "is it normal", not "agree with me!"
--
myownopinions
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Was that the, INN my dad spanks me at 18?
--
Angel_in_a_Glass_Dress
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yep. if that was a troll that's something else but... it does serve as a classic example of someone trying to justify their own bad behavior.
Hey, just to clear this up right now. You are one of my FAVORITE posters here and the way you handle idiots is epic. I am not referring to you at all :)
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Not going to lie, I thought this would of been specificly directed to me for the few debates I've been having recently.
All in all, I still think the best way to avoid people like these are to not intentionally read comments by such people or go on stories and polls that are bound to do such things.
I am a bit of a self righteous and judgemental person, and I can understand why people would see me as such. But I still think it's the person's choice to read such things those people give out on this site.
There are quite a few I see as annoing, self-righteous, judgmental people, but I still think that if it's something they strongly believe, they have the right to speak about it. Only when they start avoiding facts, and avoid answering questions in which would prove they're wrong do I think they need to stop starting things they aren't willing to finnish just because certain things come up.
Thanks for the favourite comment.
--
Anonymous Post Author
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
That's cool :)
I love hearing different opinions and am fond of debate myself. No problems with that.
My issue is with people who call people sick or perverted for the most ordinary foibles. Just because it's something they personally would not do. Or because someone chose a different way of life to them and they do not approve of this, rendering them unable to give an objective reply. I am not saying they have to agree or anything like that. I love a spirited debate.
Answerers on this thread have also assumed I refer to long posts, when this is not, in fact, the case at all. I suppose that's my own fault as people see "lecture" as "lengthy" when in fact I meant it as the dictionary version "formal reproof" not a long discourse.
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Yeah, I agree.