Where did I say anything about the morning-after pill?
If you can get access to that where you live and using of it isn't in conflict with your ethical beliefs, you obviously should have taken it as soon as you could.
As far as pregnancy testers are concerned, they aren't so sensitive that they can detect the hormone they rely on to indicate pregnancy within a couple of days of conception. Also, sperm can remain viable in the uterus for up to five days after ejaculation, so it's possible for conception to be delayed.
Your definition of "reasonable precautions" clearly isn't the same as mine. It seems to me your attitude is similar to that of someone who decides to walk through the roughest part of town on their own late at night because they believe nobody has the right to assault and rob them, and thinks that the only "reasonable precaution" they need to take is keeping their phone and money out of sight in their pocket. When someone stabs and robs them even though they tell the dipshit they have no right to do that, they're outraged, and believe they bear no responsibility for what happened, even though they deliberately put themselves in a risky situation.
So you are saying that people should be robbed? That is a very predatory mindset. Especially considering some are actually very poor and are often forced into these type of situations or enviorments. So you are basically saying fuck all poor people and familys for not making enough to live in a rich city. Like your privileged ass right?
Have you ever considered if you might be on the autistic spectrum?
It's possible that you just have poor reading comprehension skills, such limited experience of life that you have an unrealistic, idealised vision of human nature, and you always interpret what others say negatively once they say something you find challenging. But the way you've responded to my replies here and how you described the situation that prompted you to ask your original question makes me wonder if you have serious difficulties understanding the thoughts and feelings of others.
Have you ever considered the simple fact of being poor is not a reason to be attacked and only a predator would say so? You said if someone walks out at night they deserve to be robbed. Ideally this would not happen but a number of circumstances might make this the case. Consider a person is poor, can not afford a car, works a very late shift and their vehicle breaks down. You are saying 100percent that person deserves to be attacked. Are you really that blind to how real life works? I mean I did not think privilege really made people this FUCKING stupid.
IIN to force pregnancy on a girl and is it illegal
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Where did I say anything about the morning-after pill?
If you can get access to that where you live and using of it isn't in conflict with your ethical beliefs, you obviously should have taken it as soon as you could.
As far as pregnancy testers are concerned, they aren't so sensitive that they can detect the hormone they rely on to indicate pregnancy within a couple of days of conception. Also, sperm can remain viable in the uterus for up to five days after ejaculation, so it's possible for conception to be delayed.
Your definition of "reasonable precautions" clearly isn't the same as mine. It seems to me your attitude is similar to that of someone who decides to walk through the roughest part of town on their own late at night because they believe nobody has the right to assault and rob them, and thinks that the only "reasonable precaution" they need to take is keeping their phone and money out of sight in their pocket. When someone stabs and robs them even though they tell the dipshit they have no right to do that, they're outraged, and believe they bear no responsibility for what happened, even though they deliberately put themselves in a risky situation.
--
Anonymous Post Author
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
So you are saying that people should be robbed? That is a very predatory mindset. Especially considering some are actually very poor and are often forced into these type of situations or enviorments. So you are basically saying fuck all poor people and familys for not making enough to live in a rich city. Like your privileged ass right?
--
Boojum
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
Have you ever considered if you might be on the autistic spectrum?
It's possible that you just have poor reading comprehension skills, such limited experience of life that you have an unrealistic, idealised vision of human nature, and you always interpret what others say negatively once they say something you find challenging. But the way you've responded to my replies here and how you described the situation that prompted you to ask your original question makes me wonder if you have serious difficulties understanding the thoughts and feelings of others.
--
Anonymous Post Author
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Have you ever considered the simple fact of being poor is not a reason to be attacked and only a predator would say so? You said if someone walks out at night they deserve to be robbed. Ideally this would not happen but a number of circumstances might make this the case. Consider a person is poor, can not afford a car, works a very late shift and their vehicle breaks down. You are saying 100percent that person deserves to be attacked. Are you really that blind to how real life works? I mean I did not think privilege really made people this FUCKING stupid.
--
Boojum
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
🙄