No it's not, you don't answer why it isn't natural for any kind of person to have affinity towards men? Just because they don't produce milk? Because it seems ridiculous to me to suggest the primary reason a woman might find another woman beautiful is because they have boobs. I think your theories about our underlying instinctive motivations are dubious.
I did. Back when we were cavemen, it were the woman who took care for the children, male or female.
And by the way, i'm not saying this is the only reason, nor am i saying its the most important reason.
And besides that, this is not my theory. This is a proven fact that was simply taught to me.
You're saying (correct me if I am wrong):
In caveman times women raised children and gave them breast-milk from their breasts. This means women can find other women naturally 'super-hot' because they have breasts like the cave-mothers and a caring nature. This means men can't find men naturally 'super hot' because men don't have breasts and were hunter-gatherers in caveman times, not nurturing caregivers.
I don't see anything wrong, besides the way you put it is that what i said is the only factor, if not the main factor, which is probably not the case. And breast feeding and child-raising are just two of the many other things that can be applied to this theory.
And as a matter of fact, it is indeed a fact that this is -one of the- factors.
Is it normal to find a girl super hot?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
The answer to your question is in my comment above. And 2.2 million years is long enough to form the primal instincts, homo sapiens or not.
--
disthing
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
No it's not, you don't answer why it isn't natural for any kind of person to have affinity towards men? Just because they don't produce milk? Because it seems ridiculous to me to suggest the primary reason a woman might find another woman beautiful is because they have boobs. I think your theories about our underlying instinctive motivations are dubious.
--
Fammer3
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I did. Back when we were cavemen, it were the woman who took care for the children, male or female.
And by the way, i'm not saying this is the only reason, nor am i saying its the most important reason.
And besides that, this is not my theory. This is a proven fact that was simply taught to me.
--
disthing
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
It is theory. It isn't proven fact.
You're saying (correct me if I am wrong):
In caveman times women raised children and gave them breast-milk from their breasts. This means women can find other women naturally 'super-hot' because they have breasts like the cave-mothers and a caring nature. This means men can't find men naturally 'super hot' because men don't have breasts and were hunter-gatherers in caveman times, not nurturing caregivers.
:/
There are many things wrong with this idea.
--
Fammer3
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I don't see anything wrong, besides the way you put it is that what i said is the only factor, if not the main factor, which is probably not the case. And breast feeding and child-raising are just two of the many other things that can be applied to this theory.
And as a matter of fact, it is indeed a fact that this is -one of the- factors.