IIN to feel that extending the acrinyms to LBGTQIA is hilarious?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

← View full post
Comments ( 1 ) Sort: best | oldest
  • Wanted to add something but seems my Karma is currently like the Siberian average daily temperature and wasn't allowed (thanks for the down-votes people!)

    I was almost expecting the QIA to be a 4chan prank or the like. Where those (what is it called again, one user wants to exterminate them, again some acronym) "looking to present themselves as uber-politically correct and defending" are tricked into getting all worked up and in their do-good crusading mode without reason.

    Personally I suspect that A LOT of people who aren't "straight" are ticked of by those fools ayways. As if a homosexual person needs so much help because he or she can't fend for themselves. Might be applicable to a subset (the caricature "fairy" act), but I think most of them are pretty solid people and can fight without some heroic blog-tube-screamer getting kick of being the most ultimate PC proponent in the world.

    Is part of why I made the poll.

    PS: and now I run the risk of sounding like the over-PC guy, but every time I the the "straight" and "non-straight" adjectives, I cannot help feeling that REALLY is offensive. Wile fuzzy from fever and meds I asked myself "what isn't straight". I mean, english is not my mother tongue, so perhaps I lack the vocabulary, but the only answers I can think of are bent, crooked, erratic, squiggly, etc Somehow those sound a lot more offensive, but damned, what words are okay then??

    Comment Hidden ( show )