Normal, yes. However, common sense is kinda described for Common People. The people in the villages, that weren't able to make it to the learning institutions, however, learned to survive just as well. I agree that people are stupid and some are far more "book smart" than I am, but seriously....common sense * low coolant, usually equals overheated engine and car troubles, yet the Biblical History Scientific Theorist had to replace three of his cars....idiot! When someone researches something, they're only memorizing what someone else wrote or told them, not learning. My son looked at the shape jof a triangle and the spot it goes in, AND the spot for a circle. He learned without anyone guiding him, which matches. When I started "teaching" him colors, he simply REMEMBERED which is which. I could have told him any name. "But, you'd be wrong" only because I'd be the only one doing so. If the masses followed, then I'd be right and Tom the scientist, along with ms. Munn the English teacher, and Sir Eigfried who wrote a book about the wonderful colors...Triangle, Jump, and Touch!, would have my back. Now, if you're making an argument of how people who don't know the subject you talk about and they argue for no reason, you MAY be right. Then again, maybe you still argue for the same being right. Your words give the feel of a woman who needs to be right. When someone proves you wrong...you want documents and dates! lol. I recently quit an ex that was that way.
IIN to feel like most of the people around you lack common sense?
← View full post
Normal, yes. However, common sense is kinda described for Common People. The people in the villages, that weren't able to make it to the learning institutions, however, learned to survive just as well. I agree that people are stupid and some are far more "book smart" than I am, but seriously....common sense * low coolant, usually equals overheated engine and car troubles, yet the Biblical History Scientific Theorist had to replace three of his cars....idiot! When someone researches something, they're only memorizing what someone else wrote or told them, not learning. My son looked at the shape jof a triangle and the spot it goes in, AND the spot for a circle. He learned without anyone guiding him, which matches. When I started "teaching" him colors, he simply REMEMBERED which is which. I could have told him any name. "But, you'd be wrong" only because I'd be the only one doing so. If the masses followed, then I'd be right and Tom the scientist, along with ms. Munn the English teacher, and Sir Eigfried who wrote a book about the wonderful colors...Triangle, Jump, and Touch!, would have my back. Now, if you're making an argument of how people who don't know the subject you talk about and they argue for no reason, you MAY be right. Then again, maybe you still argue for the same being right. Your words give the feel of a woman who needs to be right. When someone proves you wrong...you want documents and dates! lol. I recently quit an ex that was that way.