Ask Your Question today
Repressing sexuality historically always occurred in the name of religion, though it had much more to do with power/control than spirituality.
Or it had to do with sanity.
Again, no. Read
Or maybe it had to do with not being filled with lust.
Or love. But that's right you hate love to.
No, only lust.
Do I really need to go back to the post where you said it?
is it normal to consider sex a disgrace to humanity?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Repressing sexuality historically always occurred in the name of religion, though it had much more to do with power/control than spirituality.
--
frankfurter50
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Or it had to do with sanity.
--
rayb12
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Again, no. Read
--
frankfurter50
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Or maybe it had to do with not being filled with lust.
--
Hateful1
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Or love. But that's right you hate love to.
--
frankfurter50
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No, only lust.
--
Hateful1
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
Do I really need to go back to the post where you said it?