All existence stems from a singular consciousness which is the manifestation of thought energy. With thoughts anything can be created and destroyed within an instant or even simultaneously. Within a split second you can create an entire planet within your mind, complete with water, plants, animals, civilizations and anything you can imagine. As the creator of this imaginary world, to someone living on it, you would essentially be their God. Now imagine that imaginary being lives and breathes on your world; he/she experiences a life in whatever fashion you imagine him/her to. As all powerful as your imagination is, you can't truly experience his/her life; a life without being able to know the outcomes; a life without having the ability to create or destroy anything or everything in an instant with effortless thought. Given this logic, if existence stems from a singular consciousness, the only way for that consciousness to truly experience existence is by separating the observing part of the consciousness from the creating part of the consciousness. This is the true nature of intelligent design. A singular consciousness that purposefully evolves from simple strands of energy to form subatomic particles, that form atoms, form molecules and so on. At the smallest levels of matter the energy seems to behave erratically and chaotically, but with every gradient of microcosmic growth comes a greater level of organization that adheres to specific laws of physics. Eventually molecules form complex protein chains and so on until there is life. The life eventually evolves to become sentient, and there now exists a sentient consciousness separate from the creating consciousness that can experience existence from an objective perspective. And in having a consciousness that is now separate from the creating consciousness, the sentient being questions life and existence, and comes up with spirituality and religion to explain what remains a mystery. Is it God; a sole creator that is responsible for our existence? Or is it all explainable through complex science? Why not both? And if that's the real truth, what is our true essence? Are we only sentient beings that will die and cease to be? Or are we truly an extension of the consciousness that is responsible for creating existence? When we die, will we rejoin the singular consciousness? I believe that we aren't really disconnected from the creating consciousness. With the proper frame of mind, communion with this consciousness can be attained. When one achieves communion, free creation will become possible. And lastly, we are all ONE, experiencing the illusion of separation; we are not separate at all. The next time you see another human being, try (really try) to see them for what they truly are; energy, consciousness, observers and most importantly a part of you. The Buddhists believe in compassion, and the Christians believe in loving thy neighbor. As long as the ideas are congruent, how one perceives the message is irrelevant. You don't have to believe what I believe, but I find this to be as true and accurate as can be logically and simply explained without adding mysticism to explain what is beyond our comprehension.
Is It Normal To Believe I am God?
← View full post
All existence stems from a singular consciousness which is the manifestation of thought energy. With thoughts anything can be created and destroyed within an instant or even simultaneously. Within a split second you can create an entire planet within your mind, complete with water, plants, animals, civilizations and anything you can imagine. As the creator of this imaginary world, to someone living on it, you would essentially be their God. Now imagine that imaginary being lives and breathes on your world; he/she experiences a life in whatever fashion you imagine him/her to. As all powerful as your imagination is, you can't truly experience his/her life; a life without being able to know the outcomes; a life without having the ability to create or destroy anything or everything in an instant with effortless thought. Given this logic, if existence stems from a singular consciousness, the only way for that consciousness to truly experience existence is by separating the observing part of the consciousness from the creating part of the consciousness. This is the true nature of intelligent design. A singular consciousness that purposefully evolves from simple strands of energy to form subatomic particles, that form atoms, form molecules and so on. At the smallest levels of matter the energy seems to behave erratically and chaotically, but with every gradient of microcosmic growth comes a greater level of organization that adheres to specific laws of physics. Eventually molecules form complex protein chains and so on until there is life. The life eventually evolves to become sentient, and there now exists a sentient consciousness separate from the creating consciousness that can experience existence from an objective perspective. And in having a consciousness that is now separate from the creating consciousness, the sentient being questions life and existence, and comes up with spirituality and religion to explain what remains a mystery. Is it God; a sole creator that is responsible for our existence? Or is it all explainable through complex science? Why not both? And if that's the real truth, what is our true essence? Are we only sentient beings that will die and cease to be? Or are we truly an extension of the consciousness that is responsible for creating existence? When we die, will we rejoin the singular consciousness? I believe that we aren't really disconnected from the creating consciousness. With the proper frame of mind, communion with this consciousness can be attained. When one achieves communion, free creation will become possible. And lastly, we are all ONE, experiencing the illusion of separation; we are not separate at all. The next time you see another human being, try (really try) to see them for what they truly are; energy, consciousness, observers and most importantly a part of you. The Buddhists believe in compassion, and the Christians believe in loving thy neighbor. As long as the ideas are congruent, how one perceives the message is irrelevant. You don't have to believe what I believe, but I find this to be as true and accurate as can be logically and simply explained without adding mysticism to explain what is beyond our comprehension.