Statutory rape, no charge, not caught. Like I said, I have been before a court once. Do you understand this fact yet, because it's not a complex one.
"why did you get court ordered to get a psych evaluation and proceed to fail said evaluation"
I didn't fail it, you can't "fail" a psych evaluation lol. Seriously, you think people "pass" and "fail" evaluation in a criminal court, how are you that dumb. This also is common knowledge, you should know this but alas.
What lies? It was just two misconceptions on your behalf. If you are going to argue facts with me you had better understand what you're talking about in the first place. Like I said before, I'm no genius, just brighter than most.
There are some people on here that have made great arguments that I quite admire, you are certainly not one of them. You just "nit pick" at people with totally inaccurate information, floundering in the petty as it were. You're capable of a line of sarcasm and failed attempts at twisting peoples words, I've seen nothing else from you. I'm well out of your league in every sense of the word.
My bad, I remembered wrong about the statutory rape. I'll give you that one.
'Fail', poor choice of words there. I think you know what I meant by that though, since you're 'brighter than most'. Put it this way, you got the 'wrong' (read:undesireable) results. You could've (should've?) bullshitted it and gave the 'right' answers so that you weren't identified in the system as mentally ill. I mean, since you want to brag about not being caught and being soooo smart and slick...that was a stupid move. The official label works against you, and is counterproductive to future criminal success.
tommythecat wrote:
"Five months in prison for assault with intent.
A week in a psychiatric hospital following a drunken rampage (I was deemed manic and homicidal for 4 days).
Three years probation for theft and resisting arrest.
Two "keep the peace" orders.
Banned from ownership of firearms for four years."
Seems as though you've been caught (in many senses of the word) a lot more than once. It also appears you've been in court a lot more than once. Either you're lying then or you're lying now so, like I said once again, you're a liar and bad at it, too, if such a 'dumbass' like myself caught you.
So your poor choice of words is my fault, you ment what you said because you're stupid. And now you try to do a half-ass cover up as usual. Petty, just like I said.
"Five months in prison for assault with intent.
"A week in a psychiatric hospital following a drunken rampage (I was deemed manic and homicidal for 4 days)."
"Three years probation for theft and resisting arrest."
All the same incident. But you would know that already if you weren't so petty and stupid.
Two "keep the peace" orders aren't a charge, an arrest, or anything like that (jeeeez come on).
Seems as though everything I said about myself, and you, still stands correct.
How do you not know what "keep the peace" orders are?
Do you know the law?
Did you go to school?
Are you this ill-informed in other topics of debate?
Is this the real limit of your reasoning ability?
Do you realise you're one of the weaklings feeding my ego?
Did it take long to drag that info up or do you know it by heart?
Two "keep the peace" orders aren't a charge, an arrest, or anything like that (jeeeez come on).
The point is, you got CAUGHT. You did *something* to warrant this. They don't hand them out free to everyone indiscriminately, do they? I never said 'caught' only means 'arrested' or 'convicted', that's YOUR misconception. Is it on your record somewhere? Do people know about it? Is it related to some criminal activity you did? Right, you GOT CAUGHT.
Assault, theft and resisting arrest are 3 different crimes. So, you got CAUGHT for at least 3 crimes.
You got sent to the nuthouse...again, CAUGHT. It doesn't matter if it was in the same incident, you have a record for it, you GOT CAUGHT.
You can't even type coherently, nor do you have a basic understanding of law. And each "point" you raised was a misconception due to not knowing the law. We are also arguing about my life, so of course I know better.
Is it normal to be worried about my record?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Statutory rape, no charge, not caught. Like I said, I have been before a court once. Do you understand this fact yet, because it's not a complex one.
"why did you get court ordered to get a psych evaluation and proceed to fail said evaluation"
I didn't fail it, you can't "fail" a psych evaluation lol. Seriously, you think people "pass" and "fail" evaluation in a criminal court, how are you that dumb. This also is common knowledge, you should know this but alas.
What lies? It was just two misconceptions on your behalf. If you are going to argue facts with me you had better understand what you're talking about in the first place. Like I said before, I'm no genius, just brighter than most.
There are some people on here that have made great arguments that I quite admire, you are certainly not one of them. You just "nit pick" at people with totally inaccurate information, floundering in the petty as it were. You're capable of a line of sarcasm and failed attempts at twisting peoples words, I've seen nothing else from you. I'm well out of your league in every sense of the word.
--
wigsplitz
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
My bad, I remembered wrong about the statutory rape. I'll give you that one.
'Fail', poor choice of words there. I think you know what I meant by that though, since you're 'brighter than most'. Put it this way, you got the 'wrong' (read:undesireable) results. You could've (should've?) bullshitted it and gave the 'right' answers so that you weren't identified in the system as mentally ill. I mean, since you want to brag about not being caught and being soooo smart and slick...that was a stupid move. The official label works against you, and is counterproductive to future criminal success.
tommythecat wrote:
"Five months in prison for assault with intent.
A week in a psychiatric hospital following a drunken rampage (I was deemed manic and homicidal for 4 days).
Three years probation for theft and resisting arrest.
Two "keep the peace" orders.
Banned from ownership of firearms for four years."
Seems as though you've been caught (in many senses of the word) a lot more than once. It also appears you've been in court a lot more than once. Either you're lying then or you're lying now so, like I said once again, you're a liar and bad at it, too, if such a 'dumbass' like myself caught you.
--
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
So your poor choice of words is my fault, you ment what you said because you're stupid. And now you try to do a half-ass cover up as usual. Petty, just like I said.
"Five months in prison for assault with intent.
"A week in a psychiatric hospital following a drunken rampage (I was deemed manic and homicidal for 4 days)."
"Three years probation for theft and resisting arrest."
All the same incident. But you would know that already if you weren't so petty and stupid.
Two "keep the peace" orders aren't a charge, an arrest, or anything like that (jeeeez come on).
Seems as though everything I said about myself, and you, still stands correct.
How do you not know what "keep the peace" orders are?
Do you know the law?
Did you go to school?
Are you this ill-informed in other topics of debate?
Is this the real limit of your reasoning ability?
Do you realise you're one of the weaklings feeding my ego?
Did it take long to drag that info up or do you know it by heart?
Can you tell me more about myself?
--
wigsplitz
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Two "keep the peace" orders aren't a charge, an arrest, or anything like that (jeeeez come on).
The point is, you got CAUGHT. You did *something* to warrant this. They don't hand them out free to everyone indiscriminately, do they? I never said 'caught' only means 'arrested' or 'convicted', that's YOUR misconception. Is it on your record somewhere? Do people know about it? Is it related to some criminal activity you did? Right, you GOT CAUGHT.
Assault, theft and resisting arrest are 3 different crimes. So, you got CAUGHT for at least 3 crimes.
You got sent to the nuthouse...again, CAUGHT. It doesn't matter if it was in the same incident, you have a record for it, you GOT CAUGHT.
--
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You seriously don't get it at all hahaha.
--
wigsplitz
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
-1
-1
I totally get it. hahaha.
--
[Old Memory]
10 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
You can't even type coherently, nor do you have a basic understanding of law. And each "point" you raised was a misconception due to not knowing the law. We are also arguing about my life, so of course I know better.