Is it normal to be what i was 6 years ago?

It started 6 years ago in Cafe Boulevard in Adelaide (it's not there anymore), I saw everyone there dressed fancy so I did likewise and acted fancy, this was in the middle of the year 2012 when pommy Steve was there at Recovery (now Miller Place), he said something about my weight and these workers at Recovery wouldn't shut up about how thin I am until I go to the mental hospital and put on some weight (Mum sent me there), then Steve was happy and understood I had plenty of weight. However part of this is based on myself being distinctive: I was distinctive therefore I dressed distinctive, I had distinctive features and since I was a solipsist and noticed this, and noticed I was acting superior, I looked up characteristic in the Merriam Webster dictionary, in its entry with synonyms there was the word distinctive, and it said 'also emphasises the superior or praiseworthy', that was the day I decided I was distinctive and stopped acting weird, and for six years I remained, most of the time, distinctive, often associated with king-loving freak. It was all about being fancy, which even earlier than 6 years ago, I did, at the age of 19, when I wore a black suit, white shirt, a tie and black slacks and ordered a Crown Lager, my standards were too high for everyone but now I'm not ashamed to act like a connoisseur which of course is no simple task. So I've been fancy all my life even at the age of 14 when I made good food in a fancy way, and in my art when it wasn't just artistic but arty. I'm the king of fancy, the king of ostentatious, almost nothing fancy is less than excessively fancy. Fancy means it's good, specifically it means grotesquely designed and decorated, incongruous, with a sudden fancy to dress one way or the other, quaint and therefore old-fashioned (I've seen it myself, fancy tends to be old-fashioned), and extravagant (excessive and wanting in moderation), and realising this, I don't just choose the fancy as ornamental and not plain, but the above definition meaning it's got excessive detail. As 6 years ago, I chose philosophy, and tried and failed to only follow the posh philosophies. I told my younger brother I'll only follow the posh philosophies but he took a dislike of this and got upset. I think this is OK, because the posh should only follow the posh, I even reduced my purism to only posh music, not pop, black metal, folk or even bluegrass, so I'm pretty sure I can reduce my philosophies, even my ideologies, to only the posh ones. Fanciness doesn't make my younger brother happy, but it makes me happy. Therefore the way I was 6 years ago is the way I ought to be, is any of it normal?