Whoever defined it this way must suffer from lack of creativity, poor sex drive and was probably sexually inhibitted. And this definition reflects the personal taste of its creator, otherwise while anal and not oral or footjobs or handjobs? What makes anal sex more normal than oral sex?
In textbooks of sexology there is much more plausible definition of sexual normalcy/normality - whatever is done consensually between two or more partners without harming them. This definition sounds better to me but my personal "definition" would be maybe even broader, but not necessarily.
No auctully most sex acts are considered kinky if unnescary for procreation. blowjobs are kinky, food for play kinky,knives kinky. eating poo and vomit for sexuel thrill is kinky. Sure regulaur sex is boring but most things are infact kinky.
Who said so? Some holy book or who?
And anal sex is not necessary for procreation.
And missionary is not necessary for procreation, woman can get pregnant also when riding a man when she is on top or when man enters her vagina from behind.
Then I suppose that condoms and contraception is kinky, because it is not necessary for procreation.
This is definitely not something I would agree with, not even in the most horrible nightmare or total intoxication.
I will go look it up. I got that information awhile back I am going to see if I can link it to you. Also Condoms is a prevention teqnique in a completely different category. I also do not see why it is such a issue? What do you have against kinky?
I have nothing against kinky. The only difference bewteen us is that I do not consider certain activities kinky and you think they are kinky. It is just a matter of opinion, I am not "right" or "wrong", I have just different opinion on this matter.
My attitude is this: There are non-kinky things, then kinky things. I like some of the non-kinky things (not all of them) and I like some of the kinky things (not all of them, but I do not judge people who like them). For example, my perspective is this: oral sex = not kinky for me and I like it, handjob = not kinky and I like it, different sex positions = not kinky and I like it. Now something kinky:
a woman slaps my face hard during sex and it is arousing to me = kinky and I like it, my girlfriend spanks me with a belt, cane or a whip = kinky and I like it, my girlfriend tortures me with orgasm denial = kinky and I like it. And there are some non-kinky things (e.g. anal sex) and kinky things (e.g.playing with excrements) which I personally do not like and I have nothing against people who love them.
So I have nothing against kinky, I like some kinky things and some non-kinky - I just do not consider kinky those things which you see as kinky but I like these things. And many more.
Kinky is a positive word for me but it does not mean that everything which is positive is kinky. Oral sex - good and not kinky, masochism = good and kinky. Just my perspective, you can have completely different boundaries and personal definitions, it is OK, I am not the Right Authority who should decide the definitions for the world. In fact, nobody is the Right Authority..
It is not really an opinion. As sexuelly bizarre is the definition but the definition is very vague it is one of those things that does not have a good definition and that means anything that is not ordinary sex. Licking feet is kinky and is not ordinary. I think we all have a sense of what kinky auctully is. So i think the definition of ordinary sex as missionary would be pretty sensible. however I am still looking for the link.
I suppose you don´t understand me. You may not have read my previous comment carefully.
From your point of view oral sex, hanjobs, etc. are kinky - I wrote in one of my previous comments that I can´t imagine my life without them which means I love them to the point that I couldn´t live without them. So apparently, you are wrong when you think that I am against kinky. On the contrary... I wrote in one of my comments, I have some kinky / bizzare sexual preferences. I enjoy them very much. Being kinky is a good thing for me. By the way I voted "normal" in this threat... All in all, I think it is clear I am not against kinky at all. I just think that something like cowgirl sex position is not considered kinky but vanilla. The same is true for oral sex etc. We may discuss if it is kinky or not when it involves face slapping, spitting to the face and other potentially pleasurable forms of sexual humilation but definitely, oral sex as such is not kinky.
IIN to be Submissive to a Dominant Women enjoying licking Dirty feet?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
No auctully. It was defined that is what normal sex is. anything else is bizarre or unesscary.
--
prasatko
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
Naamah
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Whoever defined it this way must suffer from lack of creativity, poor sex drive and was probably sexually inhibitted. And this definition reflects the personal taste of its creator, otherwise while anal and not oral or footjobs or handjobs? What makes anal sex more normal than oral sex?
In textbooks of sexology there is much more plausible definition of sexual normalcy/normality - whatever is done consensually between two or more partners without harming them. This definition sounds better to me but my personal "definition" would be maybe even broader, but not necessarily.
--
Allistalla
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
No auctully most sex acts are considered kinky if unnescary for procreation. blowjobs are kinky, food for play kinky,knives kinky. eating poo and vomit for sexuel thrill is kinky. Sure regulaur sex is boring but most things are infact kinky.
--
prasatko
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Who said so? Some holy book or who?
And anal sex is not necessary for procreation.
And missionary is not necessary for procreation, woman can get pregnant also when riding a man when she is on top or when man enters her vagina from behind.
Then I suppose that condoms and contraception is kinky, because it is not necessary for procreation.
This is definitely not something I would agree with, not even in the most horrible nightmare or total intoxication.
--
Allistalla
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I will go look it up. I got that information awhile back I am going to see if I can link it to you. Also Condoms is a prevention teqnique in a completely different category. I also do not see why it is such a issue? What do you have against kinky?
--
prasatko
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I have nothing against kinky. The only difference bewteen us is that I do not consider certain activities kinky and you think they are kinky. It is just a matter of opinion, I am not "right" or "wrong", I have just different opinion on this matter.
My attitude is this: There are non-kinky things, then kinky things. I like some of the non-kinky things (not all of them) and I like some of the kinky things (not all of them, but I do not judge people who like them). For example, my perspective is this: oral sex = not kinky for me and I like it, handjob = not kinky and I like it, different sex positions = not kinky and I like it. Now something kinky:
a woman slaps my face hard during sex and it is arousing to me = kinky and I like it, my girlfriend spanks me with a belt, cane or a whip = kinky and I like it, my girlfriend tortures me with orgasm denial = kinky and I like it. And there are some non-kinky things (e.g. anal sex) and kinky things (e.g.playing with excrements) which I personally do not like and I have nothing against people who love them.
So I have nothing against kinky, I like some kinky things and some non-kinky - I just do not consider kinky those things which you see as kinky but I like these things. And many more.
Kinky is a positive word for me but it does not mean that everything which is positive is kinky. Oral sex - good and not kinky, masochism = good and kinky. Just my perspective, you can have completely different boundaries and personal definitions, it is OK, I am not the Right Authority who should decide the definitions for the world. In fact, nobody is the Right Authority..
--
Allistalla
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
It is not really an opinion. As sexuelly bizarre is the definition but the definition is very vague it is one of those things that does not have a good definition and that means anything that is not ordinary sex. Licking feet is kinky and is not ordinary. I think we all have a sense of what kinky auctully is. So i think the definition of ordinary sex as missionary would be pretty sensible. however I am still looking for the link.
Thanks for your answer but I don´t understand it quite well. Defined by whom? Unnecessary for what?
--
Allistalla
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I will asume since that is were the parts go anything else is bizarre it makes sense. Also why are you against kinky?
--
Naamah
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I suppose you don´t understand me. You may not have read my previous comment carefully.
From your point of view oral sex, hanjobs, etc. are kinky - I wrote in one of my previous comments that I can´t imagine my life without them which means I love them to the point that I couldn´t live without them. So apparently, you are wrong when you think that I am against kinky. On the contrary... I wrote in one of my comments, I have some kinky / bizzare sexual preferences. I enjoy them very much. Being kinky is a good thing for me. By the way I voted "normal" in this threat... All in all, I think it is clear I am not against kinky at all. I just think that something like cowgirl sex position is not considered kinky but vanilla. The same is true for oral sex etc. We may discuss if it is kinky or not when it involves face slapping, spitting to the face and other potentially pleasurable forms of sexual humilation but definitely, oral sex as such is not kinky.