Yeah, again with the strawmanning, along the lines of
'everyone who questions the headlines and the safety of the vaccine thinks bill gates is a lizard and tiny robots are going to infect them!''
and then complain that the person you are discussing with is not debating properly because of what they said about another person. We're not that different.
And no, they're not all saying one thing, but only certain opinions are allowed to be broadcasted by the mainstream media which is funded by a select few people. Otherwise, why would there be such a scrabble to censor and deplatform, under the name of 'fact checking'?
https://i.imgur.com/GkWmYDJ.png
It's not much of a coincidence that the mainstream media broadcasts similar opinion.
I never engaged in a debate with you, so it certainly is not a strawman.
In fact, I'm completely uninterested in debating with you because, as far as I'm concerned, saying you have qualifications on a public online platform is essentially meaningless.
I'm actually a physician.
Oh wait, no I'm not.
See.
I also have no interest in changing your mind. If you chose not to take the vaccine, good for you. More doses available for the rest of the population.
As for making an informed decision, I suppose we all define that differently. I personally only choose to take medical advice from doctors. Not reddit. Not is it normal.
So, not sorry, but go quack anti-vax at someone who cares.
Is it normal to be scared of getting the new vaccine for covid?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Yeah, again with the strawmanning, along the lines of
'everyone who questions the headlines and the safety of the vaccine thinks bill gates is a lizard and tiny robots are going to infect them!''
and then complain that the person you are discussing with is not debating properly because of what they said about another person. We're not that different.
And no, they're not all saying one thing, but only certain opinions are allowed to be broadcasted by the mainstream media which is funded by a select few people. Otherwise, why would there be such a scrabble to censor and deplatform, under the name of 'fact checking'?
https://i.imgur.com/GkWmYDJ.png
It's not much of a coincidence that the mainstream media broadcasts similar opinion.
https://www.deblauwetijger.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Geert-vanden-Bossche-2.pdf
--
CountessDouche
2 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I never engaged in a debate with you, so it certainly is not a strawman.
In fact, I'm completely uninterested in debating with you because, as far as I'm concerned, saying you have qualifications on a public online platform is essentially meaningless.
I'm actually a physician.
Oh wait, no I'm not.
See.
I also have no interest in changing your mind. If you chose not to take the vaccine, good for you. More doses available for the rest of the population.
As for making an informed decision, I suppose we all define that differently. I personally only choose to take medical advice from doctors. Not reddit. Not is it normal.
So, not sorry, but go quack anti-vax at someone who cares.