Gotta take the other side of this one. Common or not, it seems demeaning to say "you're good, for a…" It implies an assumption about a class of people rather than saying anything about the individual person, and there's no need to qualify...she's either good or she's not. Why even mention a qualifier? Why not just be encouraging instead?
Iin to be offended by being told your "good for a woman"?
← View full post
Gotta take the other side of this one. Common or not, it seems demeaning to say "you're good, for a…" It implies an assumption about a class of people rather than saying anything about the individual person, and there's no need to qualify...she's either good or she's not. Why even mention a qualifier? Why not just be encouraging instead?
--
d0esnormalmatter
3 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
It's not an "assumption" that women are weaker. Do you ever go to the gym?!?!?