Is it normal to be mean to people that aren't attractive?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

← View full post
Comments ( 8 ) Sort: best | oldest
  • Because we've been informed that being attractive is the most important thing in the world. Logically, it's obviously true, isn't it? Like, if more people got nose jobs then maybe we'd become clever enough to stop having wars, cure cancer, reverse global warming.

    It's all about the nose jobs. Or, here's a thought. Maybe there's another value system that's important? Wow. What a thought!

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • Hey, great profile update!

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • Thank you, thank you. I looked at a blank page for an hour and had no idea what to write, so I went back to tubthumping about the environment. Lifetime ambition to persuade just one person to give up their car. If everyone persuaded just one person, nobody would have them.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • Consider your ambition half fulfilled. It's a hard thing to do when there are no alternatives. But also know that, on average, I talk to about three people a month who tell me they have given up their car for a car free life. Not because they can't afford it, and not because they are old, but because they want to. It makes me very happy to know these people do exist, and they talk to their friends about it.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
        • I don’t think we’ll ever eliminate cars, but we surely can drastically reduce our reliance on them. There is absolutely no reason why - in some communities - cars outnumber the residents. We need to start seriously supporting and investing in mass transit solutions that will lead people to CHOOSE that option, rather than being a means of transportation for the transit dependent. The United States, I’m ashamed to say, is so far behind other modern nations with this. But, no country is doing all that it could to implement environmentally responsible alternatives. We listen to right-wing blowhards talking about how investing in public transit provides an unfair subsidy to those who use it and discriminates against those who don’t. Yet, they fail to acknowledge that the most heavily subsidized form of transportation is the private automobile. Investment of public funds in highway infrastructure outweighs investment in transit exponentially. You really strike a nerve with me on this, but I’m not going to rant anymore since this post was originally about unattractive people. So, I’ll try and tie the two together and say that environmentally irresponsible people are ugly.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • I was saying to someone earlier this week that America almost seems determined to design cities in such a way that it makes it necessary to own a car. It'd take decades to change that, by which time I don't think we'll be using petrol/gasoline to power engines anyway.

            What we need is either a vast leap forward in battery technology (minimal charging times, and low weight) or a way of getting more energy from less hydrogen (and a way of producing the hydrogen that isn't environmentally dodgy).

            Comment Hidden ( show )
        • species extinct every 4 minutes eh?

          Comment Hidden ( show )
    • You still fudging rule! :D

      Comment Hidden ( show )