I'm sure the person who posted that would have been very comfortable living in 12th century Europe where the Catholic Church prosecuted people for adultery, and the definition of that crime included a married couple having sex with the woman on top, oral sex, doggy-position sex, and anal sex.
As long as what you and your sexual partners (if any) get up to in private is none of anyone else's damned business, and what other people do in private is none of your damned business.
People have the right to believe whatever they want. People also have the right to believe that their attitudes are the only correct ones. But anyone who claims that something they believe must be right simply because that's what they believe only demonstrates that they're a total idiot who doesn't recognise the fallacy of a circular argument.
IIN to be like the guy that thought period sex was something no one did
← View full post
I'm sure the person who posted that would have been very comfortable living in 12th century Europe where the Catholic Church prosecuted people for adultery, and the definition of that crime included a married couple having sex with the woman on top, oral sex, doggy-position sex, and anal sex.
As long as what you and your sexual partners (if any) get up to in private is none of anyone else's damned business, and what other people do in private is none of your damned business.
People have the right to believe whatever they want. People also have the right to believe that their attitudes are the only correct ones. But anyone who claims that something they believe must be right simply because that's what they believe only demonstrates that they're a total idiot who doesn't recognise the fallacy of a circular argument.