Why should the onus be on the customers to make sure the employee makes minimum wage? In any other job, the onus is on the employer to pay the employee fairly, not the customer to pay the employee. Why not bring serving jobs in line with any other industry?
I never said 2.30 an hour was fair. It isn't. But it shouldn't be up to the customer to pay more than the price on the bill, it should be up to whoever owns the place to raise the prices and pay the workers more. EMPLOYERS should pay workers, not CUSTOMERS. At least that's what I'm arguing. If you can't understand that through your blind hatred of anyone else with a different viewpoint to you...
If you make less that minimum wage, which is a legal requirement, whoever employs you has broken the law. You ought to be able to take the company to court.
it is. not illegal. because tips. are factored into a paycheck. when a restaurant. looses ability to. tip its employees. that is when they go out of business.
Let's say I was brought up to making what I do, as a waiter, tips considered--about 10 dollars an hour (maybe a little more, maybe a little less). Even if I were to start making that without tips, there would:
1) have to be a menu price increase to pay me and the other employees that much
2) still be the reality that it is your money, as a paying customer, that is giving me my paycheck.
At this point I just want to make sure you still grasp that it is completely legal for a restaurant to pay their employees below minimum wage BECAUSE TIPS ARE FACTORED IN.
So really, your choice as someone with a naive understanding of the food industry can either tip 20% like a gentleman (when you visit America, that is), or watch the prices on restaurant food fucking skyrocket.
In my country, tips are NOT factored in. And a restaurant CANNOT pay a worker less than the minimum wage. Me presuming this was the case in your part of the world (as it seems the logical law to have) is probably the cause of our misunderstanding.
If restaurant food was 20% more expensive, with the caveat that customers did not tip, you'd still receive the same amount (and it would be consistent, which is obviously do your benefit too). I'd rather see the price of food 20% more expensive and written unambiguously on the menu than be obliged by unwritten rules to pay the 20% myself. I realise I might be alone in that preference, but it's just my opinion.
IIN to be frustrated when people dont tip after you gave great service
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Why should the onus be on the customers to make sure the employee makes minimum wage? In any other job, the onus is on the employer to pay the employee fairly, not the customer to pay the employee. Why not bring serving jobs in line with any other industry?
I never said 2.30 an hour was fair. It isn't. But it shouldn't be up to the customer to pay more than the price on the bill, it should be up to whoever owns the place to raise the prices and pay the workers more. EMPLOYERS should pay workers, not CUSTOMERS. At least that's what I'm arguing. If you can't understand that through your blind hatred of anyone else with a different viewpoint to you...
If you make less that minimum wage, which is a legal requirement, whoever employs you has broken the law. You ought to be able to take the company to court.
--
uPSIDEOFDOWn
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
it is. not illegal. because tips. are factored into a paycheck. when a restaurant. looses ability to. tip its employees. that is when they go out of business.
Let's say I was brought up to making what I do, as a waiter, tips considered--about 10 dollars an hour (maybe a little more, maybe a little less). Even if I were to start making that without tips, there would:
1) have to be a menu price increase to pay me and the other employees that much
2) still be the reality that it is your money, as a paying customer, that is giving me my paycheck.
At this point I just want to make sure you still grasp that it is completely legal for a restaurant to pay their employees below minimum wage BECAUSE TIPS ARE FACTORED IN.
So really, your choice as someone with a naive understanding of the food industry can either tip 20% like a gentleman (when you visit America, that is), or watch the prices on restaurant food fucking skyrocket.
--
dom180
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
In my country, tips are NOT factored in. And a restaurant CANNOT pay a worker less than the minimum wage. Me presuming this was the case in your part of the world (as it seems the logical law to have) is probably the cause of our misunderstanding.
If restaurant food was 20% more expensive, with the caveat that customers did not tip, you'd still receive the same amount (and it would be consistent, which is obviously do your benefit too). I'd rather see the price of food 20% more expensive and written unambiguously on the menu than be obliged by unwritten rules to pay the 20% myself. I realise I might be alone in that preference, but it's just my opinion.