Simple it would take me to long to explain it having to point out what regular feminists are about in contrast to the feminazis. Also I doubt I be able to change your mind or give you the full prospective of it. I'm not a teacher so I don't think I could give a proper view point on it. All I can say is that feminazis are annoying assholes who most people merge with feminism which have real grievances.
Unequal representation for women. Men being pressured by society to only show the emotions anger and lust. Actually most of the big stuff for women has been taken care of already well in America. The unequal pay is no longer in effect in most areas. The average is different because men have been expected to be bread winners up till now and are generally more ambitious or I guess chronically competitive bc testosterone.
"up till now"
we still are. we still make the money for our families when we have a wife and kids (i dont have any kids or a wife yet), and the mothers take care of the kids because they have the breast milk, and women have brains more adapted to parenting.
You are aware that economically both parents have to work this isn't 1950s America anymore. It's only getting worse and if one parent isn't pulling their weight then things won't be good.
That's an archaic way of thinking. 40% of women are breadwinners or the sole family provider, which has nearly quadrupled since 1960 and is on an upward trend (especially since more women are attending university than ever before). This isn't even including women who are making an equivalent amount to their husbands.
I've never even met a man who didn't want their significant other to work, either. I have met boys (not men) who don't want a woman to make as much as them because it hurts their ego, but they're sparse too. Things are just changing. The economy is different. Both parents need to contribute.
I also propose a life-changing idea; both parents can contribute to parenting.
i wasnt saying anything like that at all. i was saying men are breadwinners, most of the time. because if you have a baby, the mom is pregnant, not the dad. the mom can still work, but it is harder. then when the baby is born, the mom has to breastfeed, change diapers, etc, while the man is working to get money.
Ahh. I understand your point now. Still, that's ignoring the presence of technology. Many women buy pumps to pump their breast milk into bottles before going to work. A man surely has the capability of changing diapers and giving those bottles to a baby. In most modern homes, this ends up a tag-teamed effort to raise a child. For many women, the only time they take off work are the upcoming weeks before the pregnancy and the week after so that they can heal. This is because they do work even if they make less, and women don't receive paid leave for child-birthing in the U.S. (which is a problem feminism addresses).
Though you may be right about the 'most of the time' conjecture, I repeat that the statistic does not include women who make just as much as their husbands. Adding in that presumably large amount would likely make that statistic more like 50/50. Even if it's slightly lower, the number of breadwinner women is on the rise and is likely to soon overtake the number of men.
P.S. Thank you for the debate! I love to, and this is the first time someone hasn't called me a libtard or a cunt within three replies.
i also think that women putting breastmilk into bottles and the dad feeds the baby with said bottles is a little irresponsible. and if this "wage gap" that you feminists preach was real, why would the dad stay at home and the mom goes to work? after all, he earns 23% more than the mom, right???
IIN To be anti feminist?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
examples?
--
TheBlindInquisitor
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
Azirus
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You have a functioning brain it shouldn't be that hard to figure it out. And I don't mean that to be insulting.
--
pngn3
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
why cant you give me an example?? lmao
--
factcheck
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
TheBlindInquisitor
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
"why cant you do the work for me?? lmao"
Fixed that for you.
--
pngn3
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
if they have a point, they should be able to argue it. am i not wrong? if i was a lawyer, i shouldnt have to get proof for my opponent
Simple it would take me to long to explain it having to point out what regular feminists are about in contrast to the feminazis. Also I doubt I be able to change your mind or give you the full prospective of it. I'm not a teacher so I don't think I could give a proper view point on it. All I can say is that feminazis are annoying assholes who most people merge with feminism which have real grievances.
Unequal representation for women. Men being pressured by society to only show the emotions anger and lust. Actually most of the big stuff for women has been taken care of already well in America. The unequal pay is no longer in effect in most areas. The average is different because men have been expected to be bread winners up till now and are generally more ambitious or I guess chronically competitive bc testosterone.
--
pngn3
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
"up till now"
we still are. we still make the money for our families when we have a wife and kids (i dont have any kids or a wife yet), and the mothers take care of the kids because they have the breast milk, and women have brains more adapted to parenting.
--
TheBlindInquisitor
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
cinderfloof
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
You are aware that economically both parents have to work this isn't 1950s America anymore. It's only getting worse and if one parent isn't pulling their weight then things won't be good.
--
pngn3
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
they dont HAVE to, but they do, im not saying being a mother is unimportant AT ALL, im just saying men make most of the money still
That's an archaic way of thinking. 40% of women are breadwinners or the sole family provider, which has nearly quadrupled since 1960 and is on an upward trend (especially since more women are attending university than ever before). This isn't even including women who are making an equivalent amount to their husbands.
I've never even met a man who didn't want their significant other to work, either. I have met boys (not men) who don't want a woman to make as much as them because it hurts their ego, but they're sparse too. Things are just changing. The economy is different. Both parents need to contribute.
I also propose a life-changing idea; both parents can contribute to parenting.
source: http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/05/29/breadwinner-moms/
--
pngn3
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
i wasnt saying anything like that at all. i was saying men are breadwinners, most of the time. because if you have a baby, the mom is pregnant, not the dad. the mom can still work, but it is harder. then when the baby is born, the mom has to breastfeed, change diapers, etc, while the man is working to get money.
--
cinderfloof
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Ahh. I understand your point now. Still, that's ignoring the presence of technology. Many women buy pumps to pump their breast milk into bottles before going to work. A man surely has the capability of changing diapers and giving those bottles to a baby. In most modern homes, this ends up a tag-teamed effort to raise a child. For many women, the only time they take off work are the upcoming weeks before the pregnancy and the week after so that they can heal. This is because they do work even if they make less, and women don't receive paid leave for child-birthing in the U.S. (which is a problem feminism addresses).
Though you may be right about the 'most of the time' conjecture, I repeat that the statistic does not include women who make just as much as their husbands. Adding in that presumably large amount would likely make that statistic more like 50/50. Even if it's slightly lower, the number of breadwinner women is on the rise and is likely to soon overtake the number of men.
P.S. Thank you for the debate! I love to, and this is the first time someone hasn't called me a libtard or a cunt within three replies.
--
pngn3
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
pngn3
5 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
See More Comments =>
i also think that women putting breastmilk into bottles and the dad feeds the baby with said bottles is a little irresponsible. and if this "wage gap" that you feminists preach was real, why would the dad stay at home and the mom goes to work? after all, he earns 23% more than the mom, right???
i personally dont think women will overtake men as breadwinners, libtard cunt