You seem to believe anarchy means chaos when most often anarchists use it to define a nation without a central government. If we believed in out right chaos then we would simply refer to ourselves as chaosists and be done with it.
You obviously didn't even bother to look up social anarchism. For this I hold your vapid attack on a straw man version of anarchist thought to be contemptible while you yourself are beneath contempt. Also your premises are laughable beyond that, as if "famine, disease, crime and war" don't happen with states, most often these things are a product of a state.
I'm sorry you have mistaken me for someone that gives shit about what you believe. You see unlike you I don't have some pathetic need for others to think as I do, anarchy get it?
Wow, you are still hurting about this after two months?
This just makes me feel sad for you.
There is no discussion to be had here. I wouldn't want to convince you, I would not want someone with your level of ability to support what I believe because you are detriment to whichever cause you support. In reality I encourage you to continuing supporting whatever it is you support, so as to not saddle whatever anarchists there are in your area with your lack of imagination.
wow... you seriously are foolish if you think that people can govern themselves. sure governments are soulless entities but the world will just not run in any form of anarchy because it's almost as stupid as you are.
I've got guns you've got food... guess who dies in the end?
Is it normal to be an anarchist?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
You seem to believe anarchy means chaos when most often anarchists use it to define a nation without a central government. If we believed in out right chaos then we would simply refer to ourselves as chaosists and be done with it.
You obviously didn't even bother to look up social anarchism. For this I hold your vapid attack on a straw man version of anarchist thought to be contemptible while you yourself are beneath contempt. Also your premises are laughable beyond that, as if "famine, disease, crime and war" don't happen with states, most often these things are a product of a state.
--
Leviathanel
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
-
Leviathanel
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
so tell me oh wise one. how is a large community like a city going to survive without some sort of commercialism to bring food out of the country?
--
SuperBenzid
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I'm sorry you have mistaken me for someone that gives shit about what you believe. You see unlike you I don't have some pathetic need for others to think as I do, anarchy get it?
--
Leviathanel
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
this has nothing to do with impression foolish one.
it's just a matter of you being wrong and stupid and me pointing it out. just ask yourself how the over-populated country is going to feed its self?
--
SuperBenzid
9 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Wow, you are still hurting about this after two months?
This just makes me feel sad for you.
There is no discussion to be had here. I wouldn't want to convince you, I would not want someone with your level of ability to support what I believe because you are detriment to whichever cause you support. In reality I encourage you to continuing supporting whatever it is you support, so as to not saddle whatever anarchists there are in your area with your lack of imagination.
wow... you seriously are foolish if you think that people can govern themselves. sure governments are soulless entities but the world will just not run in any form of anarchy because it's almost as stupid as you are.
I've got guns you've got food... guess who dies in the end?