And as always, you avoid the actual point I make and would rather reply to me on he lesser point I made.
Just because something isn't done as much as another doesn't make it abnormal. There are alot of people that age that haven't even kissed someone. Re-read what I said. I said "I don't know if it's normal or not" I never said that is "isn't" normal. There is your perfect reading skills for you, yet again.
(Not bringin up our previous discusion, this is just an example I heard from someone on the subject of this story). Say if there are less males/females than the opposite gender. Just because there are more on one gender, does that mean the gender that has less than the gender with the most people "abnormal".
Now, I just read the other comments. All are basically saying it's normal to be a virgin and not have kissed someone at that age. You then say you agree with most of the commenters, which means you agree that it's nor "abnormal" and is normal. Now, I bring this up again. What was it I said? I said "I'm not sure if it's normal or not, but it's not abnormal". So, I acknowledge that it's not abnormal and don't even imply that it's not normal at all. You then come to me and say I should get my understandings corrected but in different words.
I basically say that it's not abnormal but not sure completely. That's "me" saying I'm not sure. You then replying to me assuming I said something different simply because of our previous discussion. So don't even bother trying to fool me saying that you didn't reply to me because of our previous discusio, because I neither dissagreed or agreed with the comments you said you agree with.
You're not out to get me? Not that you ever could "get me" in that sense. Coming from the person that tried to bring the discusion into the chat feature and I blanked you. You then continue to comment on the story I said I wouldn't read your next comment, simply because I wouldn't give you the attention on chat. By the way, no, I didn't read it. Once I seen your name when I scrolled down, I scrolled back up.
I don't see why you're bringing past conversations into this, I was just joking with you in the first reply...hence the:L
The majority of people lose their virginities at about 16, depending in the country. If a person who is 12 loses their virginity, they are defined as abnormal. Same applies for people much older than the average age.
And I've just scrolled through the comments to see if they were written before yours, and besically all of them say that virginity is a special thing...which I agree with.
If you look at my reply, it was just a simple tease at the fact that you said that it wasn't abnormal, but you don't know if it's normal. Surely if it's not abnormal, then it would be normal. That's why I said:
"If it's neither normal or abnormal then what is it?:L"
I wasn't starting an argument, debate or anything. It was simply a joke. No need to make such a big deal about it, christ sake man, you need to learn how to stop taking things so seriously!
It's fine:) Half the time it's impossible to interpret the tone someone's speaking in, or whether they're joking or not:D If I'm joking I put an :L or a :P.
Is it normal to be a virgin at 20 years old in the year 2011?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
And as always, you avoid the actual point I make and would rather reply to me on he lesser point I made.
Just because something isn't done as much as another doesn't make it abnormal. There are alot of people that age that haven't even kissed someone. Re-read what I said. I said "I don't know if it's normal or not" I never said that is "isn't" normal. There is your perfect reading skills for you, yet again.
(Not bringin up our previous discusion, this is just an example I heard from someone on the subject of this story). Say if there are less males/females than the opposite gender. Just because there are more on one gender, does that mean the gender that has less than the gender with the most people "abnormal".
Now, I just read the other comments. All are basically saying it's normal to be a virgin and not have kissed someone at that age. You then say you agree with most of the commenters, which means you agree that it's nor "abnormal" and is normal. Now, I bring this up again. What was it I said? I said "I'm not sure if it's normal or not, but it's not abnormal". So, I acknowledge that it's not abnormal and don't even imply that it's not normal at all. You then come to me and say I should get my understandings corrected but in different words.
I basically say that it's not abnormal but not sure completely. That's "me" saying I'm not sure. You then replying to me assuming I said something different simply because of our previous discussion. So don't even bother trying to fool me saying that you didn't reply to me because of our previous discusio, because I neither dissagreed or agreed with the comments you said you agree with.
You're not out to get me? Not that you ever could "get me" in that sense. Coming from the person that tried to bring the discusion into the chat feature and I blanked you. You then continue to comment on the story I said I wouldn't read your next comment, simply because I wouldn't give you the attention on chat. By the way, no, I didn't read it. Once I seen your name when I scrolled down, I scrolled back up.
Have a nice day.
--
bananaface
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I don't see why you're bringing past conversations into this, I was just joking with you in the first reply...hence the:L
The majority of people lose their virginities at about 16, depending in the country. If a person who is 12 loses their virginity, they are defined as abnormal. Same applies for people much older than the average age.
And I've just scrolled through the comments to see if they were written before yours, and besically all of them say that virginity is a special thing...which I agree with.
If you look at my reply, it was just a simple tease at the fact that you said that it wasn't abnormal, but you don't know if it's normal. Surely if it's not abnormal, then it would be normal. That's why I said:
"If it's neither normal or abnormal then what is it?:L"
I wasn't starting an argument, debate or anything. It was simply a joke. No need to make such a big deal about it, christ sake man, you need to learn how to stop taking things so seriously!
--
[Old Memory]
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
My apologies. I wasn't aware it was a joke.
--
bananaface
11 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
It's fine:) Half the time it's impossible to interpret the tone someone's speaking in, or whether they're joking or not:D If I'm joking I put an :L or a :P.
Have a nice day aswell:)