Science is a great endeavour, but leaves no proof whatsoever that I'm insane, it left no proof that I need any medicines, that's why as a Luciferian I must remain sceptical, because what you say is fluid, and because beliefs aren't true, and if I knew I was sensible I'd use reason and make a big song and dance out of it, why shouldn't I? And I don't need the medical, I need to understand that my religions are the only ones that aren't silly, aren't nonsense, and are sensible and not stupid or ridiculous, God loves you, therefore he wants me to act sane literally, that is to act as if my brain is not a disease, it is what it is, it's the reality you can't accept and you're just going to have to accept that without medicines, without changes, I distrust everyone so I promise you I will never go on this website again, so fuck you!
Exactly the three I was endeavouring to do, I understand intelligence is odd, but the person itself isn't, he can disguise his intelligence as a normal thing, I've seen it: it's normal to be intelligent, it's normal to be stupid, two halves of the Australian population are either of the two extremes and there's a lot of people who won't even care to pay attention to my brain posthumously given to science, if the dead Einstein can give his brain away so can I, and as I found out and I never told you, Einstein is a genius after all, he seems pseudo-genius because he glorifies his brain (both literally and unliterally), but making everyone think he's a genius he's still a genius, however he's a bullshit artist and not as genius as Newton so I choose to be Newtonian, all my science is an ancient theory including the faith-science I invented (little do people know it's secular, it's not mystical like Rosicrucianism, it's not spiritual, godly, atheistic or anything like that, it's completely secular, invented when I was a Christian, when I founded this belief the war started, because it's relating to science and contradicts the beliefs of others, although it shuts up about religion 100%, it implies that God doesn't exist, as in my proof that reality is instilled in the mind and otherwise and because God is only instilled in the mind God doesn't exist). I gave up Lucifer concepts, I'm back to my old belief of hating religions, and believe me that's as authentic as I will ever get, pursuit of what I used to believe in, except Buddhism, I don't hate that, therefore only Buddhism as I found the hard way is the one and only true sect and religion, it has to be that way, since it's unknowable as to whether there's life after death, it might happen, therefore I neither believe nor doubt life after death, science is merely belief, but science disproving religion is an oxymoron, it's really the scientist's job to discredit everything you say, it's not their job to attack on religious belief and religious unbelief (e.g. atheism), since atheism is a religion, religious atheists and some of the religious are the only people who understand this, it's simply a matter of two antireligious religions: atheism, and antitheism, which aren't beliefs in antireligiousness but just oppositions to God, therefore you can be a religious antitheist, or a religious atheist, but neither of them can be saints.
I tried to believe my religious beliefs, I tried, but there's a subtle way to trick people's minds into subjectivity. The real truth is I'm science and science is objective. There's no God, no gods and no afterlife. The gods, which is no gods, are the aliens you're worshipping, you only hate me because my hate for religion hurts your ego. Well good! Truth is not from the heart, it's from the brain, and I'll never doubt my beliefs again, they're solid, they're sound. If you can't verify or observe it, if you can't even perceive it, it's a trap into subjectivity, reality (all of it) is within my perception, no faith in the world I can believe but science, unless Tibetan Buddhism has a good argument as to why its objectivity even about death is true, I can't believe it. I don't believe in sceptical science, I believe in faith-science, esoteric science, and philosophical science, I can't prove it, it's my faith and you're just going to have to accept it. Truth as I found out is literal, not symbolic, and even if religion is true it's false, it's manufactured from all that's in the teacher's head, it doesn't come from observing, it doesn't come from experience, and it doesn't come from other beliefs, morals, even food and clothes, religions just make it up. I can't prove it except to my mother but my belief that there are no spiritual beings means there's no God, no Satan, no soul, no spirits, no ghosts, and no Zius which is made up. There's only one reality of the supernatural: the physical, if it's not physical it's not there therefore I'll take up physicalism. I'll take up no objectivity unless the objectivity is true, unless I can verify it with evidence. I admit Buddhism has made progress, it even has science on its side, but Buddhism needs an extraordinary argument for me to believe it.
I've got the extraordinary argument for the matrix and Buddhism, and here it is: we're living in a hyperreality and because it looks convincingly real we think this isn't a dream world, but we're wrong, and immoral actions don't stop life but are part of life, that's why morality prevents rebirth, it puts you to death because evil uses a lot of energy, good doesn't so it puts you to sleep, and I imagined years ago by mistake wires attached to my head, years later I saw computer graphics in the air, very low resolution, so that means I'm in a digital reality, that's how I finally know that religion is true but God isn't.
Is it normal to be a gentleman?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Science is a great endeavour, but leaves no proof whatsoever that I'm insane, it left no proof that I need any medicines, that's why as a Luciferian I must remain sceptical, because what you say is fluid, and because beliefs aren't true, and if I knew I was sensible I'd use reason and make a big song and dance out of it, why shouldn't I? And I don't need the medical, I need to understand that my religions are the only ones that aren't silly, aren't nonsense, and are sensible and not stupid or ridiculous, God loves you, therefore he wants me to act sane literally, that is to act as if my brain is not a disease, it is what it is, it's the reality you can't accept and you're just going to have to accept that without medicines, without changes, I distrust everyone so I promise you I will never go on this website again, so fuck you!
--
McBean
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Why not fuck yourself, and then with newly acquired bodily satisfaction, you can pursue science with rigor and the discipline of critical thought.
--
Hansberger
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Exactly the three I was endeavouring to do, I understand intelligence is odd, but the person itself isn't, he can disguise his intelligence as a normal thing, I've seen it: it's normal to be intelligent, it's normal to be stupid, two halves of the Australian population are either of the two extremes and there's a lot of people who won't even care to pay attention to my brain posthumously given to science, if the dead Einstein can give his brain away so can I, and as I found out and I never told you, Einstein is a genius after all, he seems pseudo-genius because he glorifies his brain (both literally and unliterally), but making everyone think he's a genius he's still a genius, however he's a bullshit artist and not as genius as Newton so I choose to be Newtonian, all my science is an ancient theory including the faith-science I invented (little do people know it's secular, it's not mystical like Rosicrucianism, it's not spiritual, godly, atheistic or anything like that, it's completely secular, invented when I was a Christian, when I founded this belief the war started, because it's relating to science and contradicts the beliefs of others, although it shuts up about religion 100%, it implies that God doesn't exist, as in my proof that reality is instilled in the mind and otherwise and because God is only instilled in the mind God doesn't exist). I gave up Lucifer concepts, I'm back to my old belief of hating religions, and believe me that's as authentic as I will ever get, pursuit of what I used to believe in, except Buddhism, I don't hate that, therefore only Buddhism as I found the hard way is the one and only true sect and religion, it has to be that way, since it's unknowable as to whether there's life after death, it might happen, therefore I neither believe nor doubt life after death, science is merely belief, but science disproving religion is an oxymoron, it's really the scientist's job to discredit everything you say, it's not their job to attack on religious belief and religious unbelief (e.g. atheism), since atheism is a religion, religious atheists and some of the religious are the only people who understand this, it's simply a matter of two antireligious religions: atheism, and antitheism, which aren't beliefs in antireligiousness but just oppositions to God, therefore you can be a religious antitheist, or a religious atheist, but neither of them can be saints.
--
McBean
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Okay, you have a game plan. You are going to fuck yourself. Pull down your pants and start humping.
--
Hansberger
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I tried to believe my religious beliefs, I tried, but there's a subtle way to trick people's minds into subjectivity. The real truth is I'm science and science is objective. There's no God, no gods and no afterlife. The gods, which is no gods, are the aliens you're worshipping, you only hate me because my hate for religion hurts your ego. Well good! Truth is not from the heart, it's from the brain, and I'll never doubt my beliefs again, they're solid, they're sound. If you can't verify or observe it, if you can't even perceive it, it's a trap into subjectivity, reality (all of it) is within my perception, no faith in the world I can believe but science, unless Tibetan Buddhism has a good argument as to why its objectivity even about death is true, I can't believe it. I don't believe in sceptical science, I believe in faith-science, esoteric science, and philosophical science, I can't prove it, it's my faith and you're just going to have to accept it. Truth as I found out is literal, not symbolic, and even if religion is true it's false, it's manufactured from all that's in the teacher's head, it doesn't come from observing, it doesn't come from experience, and it doesn't come from other beliefs, morals, even food and clothes, religions just make it up. I can't prove it except to my mother but my belief that there are no spiritual beings means there's no God, no Satan, no soul, no spirits, no ghosts, and no Zius which is made up. There's only one reality of the supernatural: the physical, if it's not physical it's not there therefore I'll take up physicalism. I'll take up no objectivity unless the objectivity is true, unless I can verify it with evidence. I admit Buddhism has made progress, it even has science on its side, but Buddhism needs an extraordinary argument for me to believe it.
--
McBean
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
EXCELLENT. I never thought you would make perfect sense, but here it is. Perfect sense. Dude, welcome to my world.
--
Hansberger
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
I've got the extraordinary argument for the matrix and Buddhism, and here it is: we're living in a hyperreality and because it looks convincingly real we think this isn't a dream world, but we're wrong, and immoral actions don't stop life but are part of life, that's why morality prevents rebirth, it puts you to death because evil uses a lot of energy, good doesn't so it puts you to sleep, and I imagined years ago by mistake wires attached to my head, years later I saw computer graphics in the air, very low resolution, so that means I'm in a digital reality, that's how I finally know that religion is true but God isn't.