And you are a lunatic who thinks everything apart from your opinion is right. I remember you very well. Every single time you didn't like something you threw insults. You are not impressive at all. You call everything you don't want to hear as "troll" and you're done with it. The same ignorance of a world without values. Also ignore all the facts about races and call everybody else "racist", because that will surely solve everything.
I am readily able to, and do, admit when I am wrong.
I also frequently agree with users I don't like on here. Just because I don't like them, doesn't mean they can't be right.
I also, on occasion, disagree with people I like on here. Doesn't mean I don't still like them. In those of us with more than a few brain cells, this is not a complicated concept.
I'm not remotely concerned if you find me impressive or not. Your behaviour clearly backs me up, so I'm doing ok.
There are patterns in this world. Humans are comprised by genotype and phenotype. There are patterns and differences both in individuals and in groups and they are explained by both genotype and phenotype.
The truth is that there are strong associations of specific traits with behaviour and intelligence. There are numerous studies on that. Will only give you a taste of it with this one:
You can find lots of them who confirm these realities. Both sides contribute to the individual and to what he/she does in life. These theories are true and are confirmed by patterns of crime rates, violence, academic performance and performance, chosen careers, STDs and many more. You will see some people bringing stats and facts in an attempt to change prove that "we're all equal" showing how members of a group which is associated with lower performance manage to outsmart the rest. Sure, they are also true, but people are misusing them to deny the previous ones and to push their propaganda. The truth is that most of these stats and facts are accurate and they even complete each other. It's just people misinterpreting them because they like that so much. There are patterns and there are traits associated with races, ethnicities, class, power, intellect and many more. These are all FACTS. Denying them makes you totally ridiculous.
Now here are the OPINIONS and STANCES on these socio-political topics:
Conservatives: believe that these patterns form a natural order and that we have a hierarchy and a "naturality" in our lives. This means that we cannot deny these patterns and we cannot simply ignore the truths and facts just because they hurt. In this area, you have several subdivisions, such as ultraconservatives (who tend to take it very harshly and to punish people who are at the bottom of these hierarchies - e.g. Chechenya has concentration camps), or traditional/moderate conservatives (who believe that the orders exist but will not try to forcefully maintain it, engendering fluidity among categories and enabling people to move back and forth as long as they follow some basic teachings such as religious practices or monoethnic/monocultural societal values). There are also centrists (right-wing towards central values) who try to slowly detach from such orders but will do it smoothly without rejecting or pushing away everything in this spectrum. Many of them are living in the modern world and sometimes they make controversial but accurate statements (see cases of "racism" when people drop "bombs of truths" everywhere in press).
Centrists are trying to maintain a middleground between the two major ideologies, acknowledging both sides and their advantages.
Left-wing has some interesting paths, from classical liberalism which has a right-wing nature of some sort, to modern progressivism and all that stuff. The reason I dislike most of them is because they deny the truths of our world. They hide every single statement that tries to challenge their thoughts under the "racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, aerophobic" blanket. When these are used against facts and not in the right circumstance, they are ridiculous and doing so they defy all rules and principles of a fair debate and freedom of speech.
I find myself in a central area but with conservative values and aspirations. I hate ultraconservatives as much as you do because they ruin lives and they try to change people's minds according to their extreme agenda. So does progressivism in the modern world of the West. I want to stay away from both these things. I don't want any persecutions and any brainwashing.
When one of these people here say: "You have no reason to hate this group/race/ethnicity" or "What they have done to you??", they simply tell me that I have to wait to suffer in order to make a judgement. They also reveal knowing nothing about the history of a group and their implication in our society. Furthermore, they engender extremism by isolating others with different opinions, grow hate in their hearts for others and others have to respond. This kind of separation leads to collapsing societies, and terrorism rates show it so that several western modern countries achieved rates of terrorism as high as ultraconservative ones like Russia. This is one of the causes. Well, this and insanely bombing refugees in an attempt to "stop" them from fleeing all the bombs.
You want to tell me something about all these things? Back it up with facts and stats. Simple statements don't impress me. I know we are different and I know some cultures are better than others. I know that averages show how some races are also smarter than others. It happens in dogs, in birds, in most animals, why wouldn't it happen, to a lesser extent, in humans?
If you call me racist and I call you lunatic we'll never end this. Just give me my freedom of speech and you have yours and avoid all tensions. Ban the truth and you'll see the tensions rise. Your call.
...congrats. That had exactly zero to do with your initial comment to me. How surprising.
You should probably work out what "freedom of speech" actually is, dude. At no point has your freedom of speech been endangered by me. I have exactly zero power to censor you, other than reporting comments, which I did not do, because, quite frankly, I gain far more from letting you speak freely and look like *you* are, in fact, the lunatic, with your inability to understand the drivel you spew. My particular favourite is when you accuse others of misinterpreting data when you do exactly the same. Bravo.
You are very free to say your piece, as you have done. You fail to understand that "freedom of speech" does not include "freedom of consequences" from your speech...and the consequences are you embarrass yourself and other people will call you on your bullshit or simply laugh at your stupidity.
I'm no longer interested in doing the former, it's there for others to read and judge you as they wish. I suspect most will be joining me in the latter.
Any more hypocrisy you wanna put out there, champ?
Is it normal to be “Anti-Jewish”?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
And you are a lunatic who thinks everything apart from your opinion is right. I remember you very well. Every single time you didn't like something you threw insults. You are not impressive at all. You call everything you don't want to hear as "troll" and you're done with it. The same ignorance of a world without values. Also ignore all the facts about races and call everybody else "racist", because that will surely solve everything.
--
TerriAngel
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
-
charli.m
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
1
1
Well said.
I am readily able to, and do, admit when I am wrong.
I also frequently agree with users I don't like on here. Just because I don't like them, doesn't mean they can't be right.
I also, on occasion, disagree with people I like on here. Doesn't mean I don't still like them. In those of us with more than a few brain cells, this is not a complicated concept.
I'm not remotely concerned if you find me impressive or not. Your behaviour clearly backs me up, so I'm doing ok.
So please, continue.
--
WarriorGene
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
Alright, I will continue.
There are patterns in this world. Humans are comprised by genotype and phenotype. There are patterns and differences both in individuals and in groups and they are explained by both genotype and phenotype.
The truth is that there are strong associations of specific traits with behaviour and intelligence. There are numerous studies on that. Will only give you a taste of it with this one:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912000840
You can find lots of them who confirm these realities. Both sides contribute to the individual and to what he/she does in life. These theories are true and are confirmed by patterns of crime rates, violence, academic performance and performance, chosen careers, STDs and many more. You will see some people bringing stats and facts in an attempt to change prove that "we're all equal" showing how members of a group which is associated with lower performance manage to outsmart the rest. Sure, they are also true, but people are misusing them to deny the previous ones and to push their propaganda. The truth is that most of these stats and facts are accurate and they even complete each other. It's just people misinterpreting them because they like that so much. There are patterns and there are traits associated with races, ethnicities, class, power, intellect and many more. These are all FACTS. Denying them makes you totally ridiculous.
Now here are the OPINIONS and STANCES on these socio-political topics:
Conservatives: believe that these patterns form a natural order and that we have a hierarchy and a "naturality" in our lives. This means that we cannot deny these patterns and we cannot simply ignore the truths and facts just because they hurt. In this area, you have several subdivisions, such as ultraconservatives (who tend to take it very harshly and to punish people who are at the bottom of these hierarchies - e.g. Chechenya has concentration camps), or traditional/moderate conservatives (who believe that the orders exist but will not try to forcefully maintain it, engendering fluidity among categories and enabling people to move back and forth as long as they follow some basic teachings such as religious practices or monoethnic/monocultural societal values). There are also centrists (right-wing towards central values) who try to slowly detach from such orders but will do it smoothly without rejecting or pushing away everything in this spectrum. Many of them are living in the modern world and sometimes they make controversial but accurate statements (see cases of "racism" when people drop "bombs of truths" everywhere in press).
Centrists are trying to maintain a middleground between the two major ideologies, acknowledging both sides and their advantages.
Left-wing has some interesting paths, from classical liberalism which has a right-wing nature of some sort, to modern progressivism and all that stuff. The reason I dislike most of them is because they deny the truths of our world. They hide every single statement that tries to challenge their thoughts under the "racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, aerophobic" blanket. When these are used against facts and not in the right circumstance, they are ridiculous and doing so they defy all rules and principles of a fair debate and freedom of speech.
I find myself in a central area but with conservative values and aspirations. I hate ultraconservatives as much as you do because they ruin lives and they try to change people's minds according to their extreme agenda. So does progressivism in the modern world of the West. I want to stay away from both these things. I don't want any persecutions and any brainwashing.
When one of these people here say: "You have no reason to hate this group/race/ethnicity" or "What they have done to you??", they simply tell me that I have to wait to suffer in order to make a judgement. They also reveal knowing nothing about the history of a group and their implication in our society. Furthermore, they engender extremism by isolating others with different opinions, grow hate in their hearts for others and others have to respond. This kind of separation leads to collapsing societies, and terrorism rates show it so that several western modern countries achieved rates of terrorism as high as ultraconservative ones like Russia. This is one of the causes. Well, this and insanely bombing refugees in an attempt to "stop" them from fleeing all the bombs.
You want to tell me something about all these things? Back it up with facts and stats. Simple statements don't impress me. I know we are different and I know some cultures are better than others. I know that averages show how some races are also smarter than others. It happens in dogs, in birds, in most animals, why wouldn't it happen, to a lesser extent, in humans?
If you call me racist and I call you lunatic we'll never end this. Just give me my freedom of speech and you have yours and avoid all tensions. Ban the truth and you'll see the tensions rise. Your call.
--
charli.m
4 years ago
|
pl
Comment Hidden (
show
)
Report
0
0
...congrats. That had exactly zero to do with your initial comment to me. How surprising.
You should probably work out what "freedom of speech" actually is, dude. At no point has your freedom of speech been endangered by me. I have exactly zero power to censor you, other than reporting comments, which I did not do, because, quite frankly, I gain far more from letting you speak freely and look like *you* are, in fact, the lunatic, with your inability to understand the drivel you spew. My particular favourite is when you accuse others of misinterpreting data when you do exactly the same. Bravo.
You are very free to say your piece, as you have done. You fail to understand that "freedom of speech" does not include "freedom of consequences" from your speech...and the consequences are you embarrass yourself and other people will call you on your bullshit or simply laugh at your stupidity.
I'm no longer interested in doing the former, it's there for others to read and judge you as they wish. I suspect most will be joining me in the latter.
Any more hypocrisy you wanna put out there, champ?