Then why do you come here?
It's possible to disagree in a nasty manner or in a constructive manner.
In your 12 lines, there is only one line that acknowledges positive human behaviour. The other 11 lines just point out negative behaviour. As a result, you come across as misanthropic. A 1:11 ratio cannot possibly give you a healthy world view.
I'm not saying that you don't raise some true and important points. What I'm saying is that there is no balance. I could choose any of the wonderful people I know and love and come up with 11 lines of valid criticism and one line of praise. But does it give a fair and complete assessment of their character? Absolutely not.
I think you should aim for at least 6:6 in 12 lines rather than your current 1:11. Once you get there, then go for higher.
Is it normal to abuse people who go online for genuine help?
↑ View this comment's parent
← View full post
Then why do you come here?
It's possible to disagree in a nasty manner or in a constructive manner.
In your 12 lines, there is only one line that acknowledges positive human behaviour. The other 11 lines just point out negative behaviour. As a result, you come across as misanthropic. A 1:11 ratio cannot possibly give you a healthy world view.
I'm not saying that you don't raise some true and important points. What I'm saying is that there is no balance. I could choose any of the wonderful people I know and love and come up with 11 lines of valid criticism and one line of praise. But does it give a fair and complete assessment of their character? Absolutely not.
I think you should aim for at least 6:6 in 12 lines rather than your current 1:11. Once you get there, then go for higher.