is it normal to

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

↑ View this comment's parent

← View full post
Comments ( 7 ) Sort: best | oldest
  • You are taking the verse out of context. The verse is in the middle of a section about Jewish government and moral law. You are the one misinterpreting the verse by removing it from its intended context.
    When the Bible says "Inchanters thou shalt not suffer to liue," it means that if you know someone to be a magic-user, you must turn them into the authorities so that they can face the death penalty. Also, you're using a heretical translation; stop it.

    "The Roman Catholic Church sure seems to bave MUCH more than its fair share of bad apples."
    You simply ignore the evil present in other groups to think that.

    If you asked that, I was not paying attention to it. To answer it, heresy is a pathway to Hell. I am no judge of souls; I cannot tell you whether he will go to Hell or not.

    Comment Hidden ( show )
      -
    • You are taking the verse out of context."

      Whatever.

      "you're using a heretical translation"

      It's really weird that God would allow his message to mankind to become corrupted.

      "You simply ignore the evil present in other groups to think that."

      I'm not. It's not just about pederasty. The Roman Catholic Criminals have LOTS of other issues too.

      "heresy is a pathway to Hell."

      You don't even know Hell exists, nutjob, let alone what's a pathway to it.

      "I am no judge of souls"

      You sure were judgmental as FUCK in other threads. In any case, literally no one deserves eternal pain, you sick bastard, as finite deeds do NOT warrant infinite punishment.

      Comment Hidden ( show )
        -
      • "Whatever"
        You were making a point; I proved your point wrong. It is very much relevant and not "whatever".

        "It's really weird that God would allow his message to mankind to become corrupted."
        This is just a rephrasing of the objection "an all-good God wouldn't allow evil to exist," which has been disproven so many times that it's really weird that anyone could think it's a good argument.

        "I'm not. It's not just about pederasty. The Roman Catholic Criminals have LOTS of other issues too."
        You have only mentioned pedophilia thus far, though. It sounds like you're moving the goalposts. Also, I notice mention what those issues actually are.

        "You don't even know Hell exists, nutjob, let alone what's a pathway to it."
        I actually do know both of those things. You are the one who knows neither.

        I was not judging souls, but actions. Actions can be judged objectively, but only an all-knowing being could judge a soul objectively. Also, the "finite deeds do not warrant infinite punishment" objection has been disproven time and again as well; it does not hold up to scrutiny.

        Comment Hidden ( show )
          -
        • As I don't wanna waste too much time on weirdos like you, there's only one thing I'll respond to:

          "I actually do know both of those things."

          How exactly? You merely BELIEVE because you were told to. You've got NO individuality, you brainwashed, anti-masturbation freak.

          Comment Hidden ( show )
            -
          • You shouldn't start conversations if you don't wish to spend the time to interact with them in good faith.

            Comment Hidden ( show )